Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32070155›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic targets2020

Emerging therapeutic targets for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Lukmanee Tradtrantip, Nithi Asavapanumas, Alan S Verkman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Natalizumab exacerbates astrocytopathy in NMOSD via blockade of endothelial VCAM1-astrocytic integrin α4 interaction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Treatment and Relapse Prevention of Typical and Atypical Optic Neuritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Update on Optic Neuritis: An International View.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. New Therapeutic Landscape in Neuromyelitis Optica.Current treatment options in neurology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lukmanee TradtrantipDepartments of Medicine and Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nithi AsavapanumasChakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Alan S VerkmanDepartments of Medicine and Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USMahidol University · TH

Funding

SynthesisP30DK072517 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VERKMAN, ALAN S · 2005 to 2022
$18.1M
Functional Role of Aquaporins in Eye PhysiologyR01EY013574 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VERKMAN, ALAN S · 2002 to 2022
$7.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013574NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentMolecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsAquaporin 4AutoantibodiesComplement System ProteinsHumansImmunoglobulin GNeuromyelitis OpticaAquaporin 4AutoantibodiesComplement System ProteinsImmunoglobulin Gaquaporin-4astrocyteautoimmunitycomplementneuroinflammationNMOSD

Identifiers

PMID32070155
PMCPMC7941255
OpenAlexW3006908216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.