ArticlePhysical review. E2020
Using contact statistics to characterize structure transformation of biopolymer ensembles.
Article in Physical review. E, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Behavior of Human β Defensin Type 3 Embedded in Different Model Lipid Membranes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Conformational transition of a polycationic hinge domain contributes to DNA binding.Biophysical chemistry · 2026Article
- Transient histone deacetylase inhibition reveals cell type invariant and specific effects of chromatin decondensation on irradiation response.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Node features of chromosome structure networks and their connections to genome annotation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Statistical Analysis of Protein-Ligand Interaction Patterns in Nuclear Receptor RORγ.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Effects of pH on an IDP conformational ensemble explored by molecular dynamics simulation.Biophysical chemistry · 2021Article
- Inferring chromosome radial organization from Hi-C data.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As a unique subset of functional polymers, many biopolymers have a set of well-defined three-dimensional (3D) structural characteristics that can be described by spatial contacts between monomers. Statistical analysis of the contacts has been extremely productive in characterizing the biopolymer structural ensemble, such as for 3D chromosome structures. Often, native contacts and compartment structures are the focus of the studies, while the generic polymer aspect, such as the overall decaying of contacts with increasing sequence distance, is analyzed separately or preemptively removed. Here, we explore insights that can be gained by performing "compartment analysis" that keeps the distance decay, which we believe is particularly useful for characterizing the structure transformation of biopolymers. We tested contact analysis on several such transformations under physical perturbation or biological processes, including (1) unfolding of proteins induced by thermal denaturation, (2) chromosome conformation transition during the cell cycle, and (3) chromosome unpacking by physicochemical perturbations. Useful score functions were developed to further quantitatively characterize the transformation judging from the contact analysis. We also find that the sinusoidal undertone of eigenvector patterns (the "unwanted," low frequency signal, in contrast to the detailed A/B compartment) that had previously been attributed to biological effects of centromere proximal and distal interactions may in fact reflect a universal feature of polymers that have relatively weaker long-range contacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.