Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32069627›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E2020

Limitations of the equivalent neutral polymer assumption for theories describing nanochannel-confined DNA.

Aditya Bikram Bhandari, Kevin D Dorfman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aditya Bikram BhandariDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, 421 Washington Ave. SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Kevin D DorfmanDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, 421 Washington Ave. SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Dynamics of DNA Barcoding in NanochannelsR01HG006851 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DORFMAN, KEVIN D · 2013 to 2018
$2.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevailing theories describing DNA confinement in a nanochannel are predicated on the assumption that wall-DNA electrostatic interactions are sufficiently short-ranged such that the problem can be mapped to an equivalent neutral polymer confined by hard walls with an appropriately reduced effective channel size. To determine when this hypothesis is valid, we leveraged a recently reported experimental data set for the fractional extension of DNA molecules in a 250-nm-wide poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) nanochannel with buffer ionic strengths between 0.075 and 48 mM. Evaluating these data in the context of the weakly correlated telegraph model of DNA confinement reveals that, at ionic strengths greater than 0.3 mM, the average fractional extension of the DNA molecules agree with theoretical predictions with a mean absolute error of 0.04. In contrast, experiments at ionic strengths below 0.3 mM produce average fractional extensions that are systematically smaller than the theoretical predictions with a larger mean absolute error of 0.15. The deviations between experiment and theory display a correlation coefficient of 0.82 with the decay length for the DNA-wall electrostatics, linking the deviations with a breakdown in approximating the DNA with an equivalent neutral polymer.

Indexed as

DimethylpolysiloxanesDNAModels, MolecularNanostructuresNylonsStatic ElectricityDimethylpolysiloxanesDNANylonspoly(dimethylsiloxane)-polyamide copolymer

Identifiers

PMID32069627
PMCPMC7040977
OpenAlexW2998968104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.