ArticlePhysical review. E2020
Limitations of the equivalent neutral polymer assumption for theories describing nanochannel-confined DNA.
Article in Physical review. E, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-molecule optical genome mapping in nanochannels: multidisciplinarity at the nanoscale.Essays in biochemistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The prevailing theories describing DNA confinement in a nanochannel are predicated on the assumption that wall-DNA electrostatic interactions are sufficiently short-ranged such that the problem can be mapped to an equivalent neutral polymer confined by hard walls with an appropriately reduced effective channel size. To determine when this hypothesis is valid, we leveraged a recently reported experimental data set for the fractional extension of DNA molecules in a 250-nm-wide poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) nanochannel with buffer ionic strengths between 0.075 and 48 mM. Evaluating these data in the context of the weakly correlated telegraph model of DNA confinement reveals that, at ionic strengths greater than 0.3 mM, the average fractional extension of the DNA molecules agree with theoretical predictions with a mean absolute error of 0.04. In contrast, experiments at ionic strengths below 0.3 mM produce average fractional extensions that are systematically smaller than the theoretical predictions with a larger mean absolute error of 0.15. The deviations between experiment and theory display a correlation coefficient of 0.82 with the decay length for the DNA-wall electrostatics, linking the deviations with a breakdown in approximating the DNA with an equivalent neutral polymer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.