Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32069301›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Concentrations of criteria pollutants in the contiguous U.S., 1979 - 2015: Role of prediction model parsimony in integrated empirical geographic regression.

Sun-Young Kim, Matthew Bechle, Steve Hankey, Lianne Sheppard, Adam A Szpiro, Julian D Marshall

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The effect of the "exposome" on developmental brain health and cognitive outcomes.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sun-Young KimDepartment of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7110-3395
Matthew BechleDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Steve HankeySchool of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Lianne SheppardDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Adam A SzpiroDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Julian D MarshallDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.

Funding

Air Pollution, the Aging Brain and Alzheimer's DiseaseR01ES026187 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LI, GAIL, SHEPPARD, ELIZABETH A LIANNE · 2016 to 2020
$3.8M
Statistical Methods to Account for Exposure Uncertainty in Environmental EpidemiologyR01ES026246 · NIEHS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SPIEGELMAN, DONNA L · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES026187NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES026246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National-scale empirical models for air pollution can include hundreds of geographic variables. The impact of model parsimony (i.e., how model performance differs for a large versus small number of covariates) has not been systematically explored. We aim to (1) build annual-average integrated empirical geographic (IEG) regression models for the contiguous U.S. for six criteria pollutants during 1979-2015; (2) explore systematically the impact on model performance of the number of variables selected for inclusion in a model; and (3) provide publicly available model predictions. We compute annual-average concentrations from regulatory monitoring data for PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2, CO, and ozone at all monitoring sites for 1979-2015. We also use ~350 geographic characteristics at each location including measures of traffic, land use, land cover, and satellite-based estimates of air pollution. We then develop IEG models, employing universal kriging and summary factors estimated by partial least squares (PLS) of geographic variables. For all pollutants and years, we compare three approaches for choosing variables to include in the PLS model: (1) no variables, (2) a limited number of variables selected from the full set by forward selection, and (3) all variables. We evaluate model performance using 10-fold cross-validation (CV) using conventional and spatially-clustered test data. Models using 3 to 30 variables selected from the full set generally have the best performance across all pollutants and years (median R2 conventional [clustered] CV: 0.66 [0.47]) compared to models with no (0.37 [0]) or all variables (0.64 [0.27]). Concentration estimates for all Census Blocks reveal generally decreasing concentrations over several decades with local heterogeneity. Our findings suggest that national prediction models can be built by empirically selecting only a small number of important variables to provide robust concentration estimates. Model estimates are freely available online.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAir PollutantsAir PollutionCarbon MonoxideEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringGeographyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansNitrogen DioxideOzoneParticulate MatterRegression AnalysisSpatial AnalysisSulfur DioxideAir PollutantsCarbon MonoxideNitrogen DioxideOzoneParticulate MatterSulfur Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID32069301
PMCPMC7028280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.