Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32069293›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Susceptibility of monomicrobial or polymicrobial biofilms derived from infected diabetic foot ulcers to topical or systemic antibiotics in vitro.

Bianca L Price, Robert Morley, Frank L Bowling, Andrew M Lovering, Curtis B Dobson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Silver Sulfadiazine Eradicates Antibiotic-TolerantJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bianca L PriceDivision of Pharmacy and Optometry, Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1843-618X
Robert MorleyPodiatric Surgery Dept, Buxton Hospital, Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust, Bakewell, United Kingdom.
Frank L BowlingDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Andrew M LoveringMicrobiology Department, Antimicrobial Reference Laboratory, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Curtis B DobsonMedical Device Biology Group, Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health (FBMH), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
University of Manchester · GBDerbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers can become chronic and non-healing despite systemic antibiotic treatment. The penetration of systematically-administered antibiotics to the site of infection is uncertain, as is the effectiveness of such levels against polymicrobial biofilms. We have developed an in vitro model to study the effectiveness of different treatments for infected diabetic foot ulcers in a wound-like environment and compared the activity of systemic levels of antibiotics with that for topically applied antibiotics released from calcium sulfate beads. This is the first study that has harvested bacteria from diabetic foot infections and recreated similar polymicrobial biofilms to those present in vivo for individual subjects. After treatment with levels of gentamicin attained in serum after systemic administration (higher than corresponding tissues concentrations) we measured a 0-2 log reduction in bacterial viability of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus or a polymicrobial biofilm. Conversely, addition of gentamicin loaded calcium sulfate beads resulted in 5-9 log reductions in P. aeruginosa, S aureus and polymicrobial biofilms derived from three subjects. We conclude that systemically administered antibiotics are likely to be inadequate for successfully treating these infections, especially given the vastly increased concentrations required to inhibit cells in a biofilm, and that topical antibiotics provide a more effective alternative.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCalcium SulfateDiabetic FootHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsCalcium Sulfate

Identifiers

PMID32069293
PMCPMC7028275
OpenAlexW3007711710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.