Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32069273›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Nonlinear mixed selectivity supports reliable neural computation.

W Jeffrey Johnston, Stephanie E Palmer, David J Freedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What can a neuron compute.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Primate neuroethology: a new synthesis.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nonresponsive Neurons Improve Population Coding of Object Location.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Linking neural population formatting to function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The neural basis of swap errors in working memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

W Jeffrey JohnstonGraduate Program in Computational Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4725-8602
Stephanie E PalmerGraduate Program in Computational Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6211-6293
David J FreedmanGraduate Program in Computational Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Funding

Cortical Mechanisms of Visual Category Recognition and LearningR01EY019041 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI David J Freedman · 2009 to 2026
$8.5M
CRCNS: Multiscale dynamics of cortical circuits for visual recognition & memoryR01MH115555 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI AMIT, YALI, BRUNEL, NICOLAS · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
CRCNS: Uncovering neurla circuit mechanisms of category computation and learningR01MH092927 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FREEDMAN, DAVID J, WANG, XIAO-JING · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Coarse-graining approaches to networks, learning, and behaviorR01EB026943 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BIALEK, WILLIAM, PALMER, STEPHANIE E · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
What goes where: Using stimulus representations from both visual streams to guide behaviorF31EY029155 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JOHNSTON, WILLIAM JEFFREY · 2018 to 2019
$90k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY029155NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019041NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026943NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092927NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal activity in the brain is variable, yet both perception and behavior are generally reliable. How does the brain achieve this? Here, we show that the conjunctive coding of multiple stimulus features, commonly known as nonlinear mixed selectivity, may be used by the brain to support reliable information transmission using unreliable neurons. Nonlinearly mixed feature representations have been observed throughout primary sensory, decision-making, and motor brain areas. In these areas, different features are almost always nonlinearly mixed to some degree, rather than represented separately or with only additive (linear) mixing, which we refer to as pure selectivity. Mixed selectivity has been previously shown to support flexible linear decoding for complex behavioral tasks. Here, we show that it has another important benefit: in many cases, it makes orders of magnitude fewer decoding errors than pure selectivity even when both forms of selectivity use the same number of spikes. This benefit holds for sensory, motor, and more abstract, cognitive representations. Further, we show experimental evidence that mixed selectivity exists in the brain even when it does not enable behaviorally useful linear decoding. This suggests that nonlinear mixed selectivity may be a general coding scheme exploited by the brain for reliable and efficient neural computation.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNonlinear DynamicsAction PotentialsAnimalsBrainDecision MakingNeurons

Identifiers

PMID32069273
PMCPMC7048320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.