Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32069269›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Recognition of Accented Speech by Cochlear-Implant Listeners: Benefit of Audiovisual Cues.

Emily Waddington, Brittany N Jaekel, Anna R Tinnemore, Sandra Gordon-Salant, Matthew J Goupell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. How to vocode: Using channel vocoders for cochlear-implant research.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily WaddingtonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Brittany N JaekelDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Anna R TinnemoreDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Sandra Gordon-SalantDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Matthew J GoupellDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.

Funding

COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF HEARINGT32DC000046 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Catherine Emily Carr, Matthew J. Goupell · 1994 to 2026
$7.5M
Auditory temporal processes, speech perception and agingR37AG009191 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI GORDON-SALANT, SANDRA M · 2002 to 2012
$3.2M
AUDITORY TEMPORAL PROCESSES, SPEECH PERCEPTION AND AGINGR01AG009191 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI GORDON-SALANT, SANDRA M · 1991 to 2017
$2.1M
Temporal processing and speech understanding in older cochlear implanteesR01AG051603 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI GOUPELL, MATTHEW J. · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG009191NIA NIH HHS R01 AG051603NIA NIH HHS R37 AG009191NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhen auditory and visual speech information are presented together, listeners obtain an audiovisual (AV) benefit or a speech understanding improvement compared with auditory-only (AO) or visual-only (VO) presentations. Cochlear-implant (CI) listeners, who receive degraded speech input and therefore understand speech using primarily temporal information, seem to readily use visual cues and can achieve a larger AV benefit than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. It is unclear, however, if the AV benefit remains relatively large for CI listeners when trying to understand foreign-accented speech when compared with unaccented speech. Accented speech can introduce changes to temporal auditory cues and visual cues, which could decrease the usefulness of AV information. Furthermore, we sought to determine if the AV benefit was relatively larger in CI compared with NH listeners for both unaccented and accented speech.

designAV benefit was investigated for unaccented and Spanish-accented speech by presenting English sentences in AO, VO, and AV conditions to 15 CI and 15 age- and performance-matched NH listeners. Performance matching between NH and CI listeners was achieved by varying the number of channels of a noise vocoder for the NH listeners. Because of the differences in age and hearing history of the CI listeners, the effects of listener-related variables on speech understanding performance and AV benefit were also examined.

resultsAV benefit was observed for both unaccented and accented conditions and for both CI and NH listeners. The two groups showed similar performance for the AO and AV conditions, and the normalized AV benefit was relatively smaller for the accented than the unaccented conditions. In the CI listeners, older age was associated with significantly poorer performance with the accented speaker compared with the unaccented speaker. The negative impact of age was somewhat reduced by a significant improvement in performance with access to AV information.

conclusionsWhen auditory speech information is degraded by CI sound processing, visual cues can be used to improve speech understanding, even in the presence of a Spanish accent. The AV benefit of the CI listeners closely matched that of the NH listeners presented with vocoded speech, which was unexpected given that CI listeners appear to rely more on visual information to communicate. This result is perhaps due to the one-to-one age and performance matching of the listeners. While aging decreased CI listener performance with the accented speaker, access to visual cues boosted performance and could partially overcome the age-related speech understanding deficits for the older CI listeners.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionCuesHumansSpeech

Identifiers

PMID32069269
PMCPMC7880303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.