Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32069181›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene

Biomechanical factors during common agricultural activities: Results of on-farm exposure assessments using direct measurement methods.

Nathan B Fethke, Mark C Schall, Howard Chen, Cassidy A Branch, Linda A Merlino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan B FethkeOccupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Mark C SchallIndustrial & Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
Howard ChenMechanical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
Cassidy A BranchPublic Policy Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Linda A MerlinoOccupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
University of Iowa · USAuburn University · US

Funding

The Heartland Center for Occupational Health and Safety Education and Research CenterT42OH008491 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI O'SHAUGHNESSY, PATRICK T · 2005 to 2025
$31.7M
Great Plains Center for Agricultural Health (GPCAH)U54OH007548 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI FETHKE, NATHAN B · 2011 to 2025
$24.6M
ACL HHS T42OH008436ACL HHS T42OH008491ACL HHS U54OH007548NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008436NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008491NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH007548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural work is associated with increased risk of adverse musculoskeletal health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to quantify exposure to biomechanical factors among a sample (n = 55) of farmers in the Midwest region of the U.S. while they performed a variety of routine agricultural activities, and to compare exposure levels between these activities. Surface electromyography was used to estimate activity levels of the erector spinae, upper trapezius, forearm flexor, and forearm extensor muscle groups. Simultaneously, inertial sensors were used to measure kinematics of the trunk, upper arm, and wrist. In general, lower muscle activity levels, less extreme postures, and slower movement speeds were observed during activities that involved primarily the use of agricultural machinery in comparison to manual activities, suggesting a potential advantage of mechanization relative to musculoskeletal health. Median wrist movement speeds exceeding recently proposed exposure thresholds were also observed during many manual activities, such as milking animals and repairing equipment. Upper arm postures and movement speeds did not appear to confer excessive risk for shoulder-related outcomes (on the whole), but interpretation of the results is limited by a sampling approach that may not have captured the full extent of exposure variation. Not surprisingly, substantial variation in exposure levels were observed within each agricultural activity, which is related to substantial variation in the equipment, tools, and work practices used by participants. Ultimately, the results of this study contribute to an emerging literature in which the physical demands of routine agricultural work have been described on the basis of sensor-based measurements rather than more common self-report or observation-based approaches.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal SystemOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureAgricultureergonomicskinematicssurface electromyography

Identifiers

PMID32069181
PMCPMC8256625
OpenAlexW3008490148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.