Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32068967›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in neuroscience2020

Assessing Neuron-Astrocyte Spatial Interactions Using the Neuron-Astrocyte Proximity Assay.

Aina Badia-Soteras, J Christopher Octeau, Mark H G Verheijen, Baljit S Khakh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Activation of GeNeuro · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aina Badia-SoterasDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Christopher OcteauDepartment of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Mark H G VerheijenDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Baljit S KhakhDepartment of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Cognitive Research (United States) · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California System · US

Funding

Fundamental astrocyte biology in intact neural circuitsR35NS111583 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Baljit Khakh · 2019 to 2026
$7.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS111583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes are morphologically complex cells with numerous close contacts with neurons at the level of their somata, branches, and branchlets. The smallest astrocyte processes make discrete contacts with synapses at scales that cannot be observed by standard light microscopy. At such contact points, astrocytes are thought to perform both homeostatic and neuromodulatory roles-functions that are proposed to be determined by their close spatial apposition. To study such spatial interactions, we previously developed a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based approach, which enables observation and tracking of the static and dynamic proximity of astrocyte processes with synapses. The approach is compatible with standard imaging techniques such as confocal microscopy and permits assessment of the most proximate contacts between astrocytes and neurons in live tissues. In this protocol article we describe the approach to analyze the contacts between striatal astrocyte processes and corticostriatal neuronal projection terminals onto medium spiny neurons. We report the required protocols in detail, including adeno-associated virus microinjections, acute brain slice preparation, imaging, and post hoc FRET quantification. The article provides a detailed description that can be used to characterize and study astrocyte process proximity to synapses in living tissue. © 2020 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Basic Protocol 1: Förster resonance energy transfer imaging in cultured cells Basic Protocol 2: Förster resonance energy transfer imaging with the neuron-astrocyte proximity assay in acute brain slices.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesBrainCell CommunicationCells, CulturedDependovirusFemaleFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferGenetic VectorsHEK293 CellsHumansLuminescent ProteinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroinjectionsLuminescent Proteinsastrocyteimagingneuronopticalsynapse

Identifiers

PMID32068967
PMCPMC7123847
OpenAlexW3006774510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.