Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32068883›Full record

ArticleJournal of phycology2020

Toward Modern Classification of Eustigmatophytes, Including the Description of Neomonodaceae Fam. Nov. and Three New Genera

Raquel Amaral, Karen P Fawley, Yvonne Němcová, Tereza Ševčíková, Alena Lukešová, Marvin W Fawley, Lília M A Santos, Marek Eliáš

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of phycology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Morphological and Molecular Genetic Analyses of the Genus Vischeria (Eustigmatophyceae, Ochrophyta) in the Algal Collection of Soil Science Institute.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2023
    Article
  7. The Long chain Diol Index: A marine palaeotemperature proxy based on eustigmatophyte lipids that records the warmest seasons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raquel AmaralCoimbra Collection of Algae (ACOI), Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2197-6593
Karen P FawleyDivision of Science and Mathematics, University of the Ozarks, Clarksville, Arkansas, 72830, USA.
Yvonne NěmcováDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, Prague2, 128 01, Czech Republic.
Tereza ŠevčíkováDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho 10, Ostrava, 710 00, Czech Republic.
Alena LukešováInstitute of Soil Biology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Sádkách 7, České Budějovice, 370 05, Czech Republic.
Marvin W FawleyDivision of Science and Mathematics, University of the Ozarks, Clarksville, Arkansas, 72830, USA.
Lília M A SantosCoimbra Collection of Algae (ACOI), Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal.
Marek EliášDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho 10, Ostrava, 710 00, Czech Republic.

Funding

Understanding Hesitant AdoptersP20GM103429 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Lawrence E Cornett, JERRY WARE · 2012 to 2026
$60.9M
VIRULENCE MECHANISMS IN ESCHERICHIA COLIP20RR016460 · NCRR · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI MURRAY, RICHARD F · 2001 to 2011
$33.1M
National Center for Research Resources U.S.A. 5P20RR016460-11National Institute of General Medical Sciences U.S.A. 8P20GM103429-11NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016460NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The class Eustigmatophyceae includes mostly coccoid, freshwater algae, although some genera are common in terrestrial habitats and two are primarily marine. The formal classification of the class, developed decades ago, does not fit the diversity and phylogeny of the group as presently known and is in urgent need of revision. This study concerns a clade informally known as the Pseudellipsoidion group of the order Eustigmatales, which was initially known to comprise seven strains with oval to ellipsoidal cells, some bearing a stipe. We examined those strains as well as 10 new ones and obtained 18S rDNA and rbcL gene sequences. The results from phylogenetic analyses of the sequence data were integrated with morphological data of vegetative and motile cells. Monophyly of the Pseudellipsoidion group is supported in both 18S rDNA and rbcL trees. The group is formalized as the new family Neomonodaceae comprising, in addition to Pseudellipsoidion, three newly erected genera. By establishing Neomonodus gen. nov. (with type species Neomonodus ovalis comb. nov.), we finally resolve the intricate taxonomic history of a species originally described as Monodus ovalis and later moved to the genera Characiopsis and Pseudocharaciopsis. Characiopsiella gen. nov. (with the type species Characiopsiella minima comb. nov.) and Munda gen. nov. (with the type species Munda aquilonaris) are established to accommodate additional representatives of the polyphyletic genus Characiopsis. A morphological feature common to all examined Neomonodaceae is the absence of a pyrenoid in the chloroplasts, which discriminates them from other morphologically similar yet unrelated eustigmatophytes (including other Characiopsis-like species).

Indexed as

RNA, Ribosomal, 16SChrysophytaDNA, RibosomalPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNADNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCharaciopsiellaEustigmatophyceaeMundaNeomonodaceaeNeomonodusPseudellipsoidionpyrenoid

Identifiers

PMID32068883
PMCPMC7987219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.