Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32068865›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2020

Participatory approaches, local stakeholders and cultural relevance facilitate an impactful community-based project in Uganda.

James O'Donovan, Andrew Thompson, Christina Stiles, Japheth A Opintan, Ken Kabali, Ian Willis, Mwebe Edward Mutimba, Elizabeth Nalweyiso, Henry Mugabi, David P Kateete and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

James O'DonovanDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrew ThompsonDepartment of Medicine, Addenbrookes Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Christina StilesDivision of Research & Global Health Equity, Omni Med, Mukono, Mukono District, Uganda.
Japheth A OpintanDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana, Korle-Bu, Ghana.
Ken KabaliDivision of Research & Global Health Equity, Omni Med, Mukono, Mukono District, Uganda.
Ian WillisDepartment of Medicine, Addenbrookes Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mwebe Edward MutimbaDivision of Community Services, Omni Med, Mukono, Mukono District, Uganda.
Elizabeth NalweyisoDivision of Community Services, Omni Med, Mukono, Mukono District, Uganda.
Henry MugabiDivision of Community Services, Omni Med, Mukono, Mukono District, Uganda.
David P KateeteMakerere University School of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Matthew AmenikoCommunity Health Water and Sanitation Agency, Accra, Ghana.
George GovinaCommunity Health Water and Sanitation Agency, Accra, Ghana.
Rachel WebermanUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine-Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.
Edward O'NeilDivision of Research & Global Health Equity, Omni Med, Mukono, Mukono District, Uganda.
Niall WintersDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ankur MutrejaDepartment of Medicine, Addenbrookes Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sanitation is a major global challenge that is often addressed at national and international levels, while community opinions and beliefs are neglected. To promote water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) we organized a cross-cultural knowledge exchange workshop to assess participatory methods for engaging local stakeholders. The workshop included 22 participants from all sectors of society. Practical solutions to sanitation challenges were identified and later shared with a local community. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were used to assess impact and showed participatory methods were highly valued to encourage information sharing among widely varied stakeholders, and that video was a particularly successful approach when engaging with local communities. An 8-month follow-up survey of village members revealed excellent information recall, positive behaviour changes and a desire for future visits. Our evidence suggests that community-based participation helped identify solutions to WASH issues affecting rural communities in resource-poor settings. Engaging in a multicultural knowledge-share was particularly valuable as it enabled participants to recognize they have common challenges and allowed them to share low-cost solutions from their different communities. Our use of video was widely viewed as an ideal means of circulating findings, as it communicated information to people with a wide variety of community roles and to all age groups. Its relevance was increased by adopting a culturally appropriate context by involving local communities in workshop activities. We recommend that research in low- and middle-income countries should be mindful of the environmental context in which WASH is implemented, and encourage acceptance by engaging with communities through the use of varied participatory methods.

Indexed as

HygieneSanitationCommunity ParticipationHumansRural PopulationUgandaAfricacommunityhygienesanitationworkshop

Identifiers

PMID32068865
PMCPMC7785315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.