Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32068850›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2020

Fecal bacterial community of finishing beef steers fed ruminally protected and non-protected active dried yeast.

Tao Ran, Peixin Jiao, Ousama AlZahal, Xiaolai Xie, Karen A Beauchemin, Dongyan Niu, Wenzhu Yang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Composition of Fecal Microbiota in Grazing and Feedlot Angus Beef Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Tao RanAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Canada.
Peixin JiaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Ousama AlZahalAB Vista, Marlborough, Wiltshire, UK.
Xiaolai XieCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Karen A BeaucheminAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Canada.
Dongyan NiuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Wenzhu YangAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAAB Vista (United Kingdom) · GBAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAChinese Academy of Sciences · CNLethbridge Research and Development CentreNortheast Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our previous study suggested that supplementation of high-grain diets with ruminally protected and non-protected active dried yeast (ADY) may potentially reduce manure pathogen excretion by feedlot cattle. We hypothesized that feeding ruminally protected ADY might change the fecal bacterial community of finishing cattle. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of feeding ruminally protected and non-protected ADY to finishing beef steers on their fecal bacterial community. Fresh fecal samples were collected on day 56 from 50 steers fed one of five treatments: 1) control (no monensin, tylosin, or ADY), 2) antibiotics (ANT, 330 mg monensin + 110 mg tylosin·steer-1d-1), 3) ADY (1.5 g·steer-1d-1), 4) encapsulated ADY (EDY; 3 g·steer-1d-1), and 5) a mixture of ADY and EDY (MDY; 1.5 g ADY + 3 g EDY·steer-1d-1). Bacterial DNA was extracted from fecal samples and sequenced using a MiSeq high-throughput sequencing platform. A total number of 2,128,772 high-quality V4 16S rRNA sequences from 50 fecal samples were analyzed, and 1,424 operational taxonomic units (OTU) were detected based on 97% nucleotide sequence identity among reads, with 769 OTU shared across the five treatments. Alpha diversity indices, including species observed, Chao estimate, abundance-based coverage estimator, Shannon, Simpson, and coverage, did not differ among treatments, and principal coordinate analysis revealed a high similarity among treatments without independent distribution. Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were dominant phyla in the fecal bacterial community for all treatments, with a tendency (P < 0.10) for greater relative abundance of Bacteroidetes but lesser Firmicutes with ANT, EDY, and MDY compared with control steers. Prevotella was the dominant genus in all treatments and steers supplemented with ANT, EDY, and MDY had greater (P < 0.05) relative abundance of Prevotella than control steers, but lesser (P < 0.03) relative abundance of Oscillospira. No differences between ADY and control were observed for the aforementioned variables. Fecal starch contents were not different among treatments, but the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, as well as Prevotella at genera level, tended (P < 0.06) to be positively correlated to fecal starch content. We conclude that supplementing ruminally protected or non-protected ADY or ANT had no effect on diversity and richness of fecal bacteria of finishing beef cattle, whereas feeding protected ADY or ANT to finishing beef steers altered the dominant fecal bacteria at phylum and genus levels. Therefore, supplementation of ruminally protected ADY may potentially improve intestinal health by stimulating the relative abundance of Prevotella.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacteriaCattleDietFecesMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SYeast, DriedRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sactive dried yeastantibioticsbeef steersfecal bacterial diversity

Identifiers

PMID32068850
PMCPMC7105065
OpenAlexW3007834230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.