Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32068838›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of epidemiology2020

Body mass index and height and risk of cutaneous melanoma: Mendelian randomization analyses.

Jean Claude Dusingize, Catherine M Olsen, Jiyuan An, Nirmala Pandeya, Matthew H Law, Bridie S Thompson, Alisa M Goldstein, Mark M Iles, Penelope M Webb, Rachel E Neale and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Life Factors and Melanoma: From the Macroscopic State to the Molecular Mechanism.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel insights into rosacea's role in cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization approach.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jean Claude DusingizeDepartment of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Catherine M OlsenDepartment of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jiyuan AnDepartment of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nirmala PandeyaDepartment of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Matthew H LawDepartment of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Bridie S ThompsonDepartment of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Alisa M GoldsteinHuman Genetics Program, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mark M IlesSection of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Penelope M WebbDepartment of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Rachel E NealeDepartment of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jue-Sheng OngDepartment of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Stuart MacGregorSchool of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
David C WhitemanDepartment of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Family Studies ZIACP004410 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SAVAGE, SHARON A. · 2009 to 2025
$56.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeight and body mass index (BMI) have both been positively associated with melanoma risk, although findings for BMI have been less consistent than height. It remains unclear, however, whether these associations reflect causality or are due to residual confounding by environmental and lifestyle risk factors. We re-evaluated these associations using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.

methodsWe identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for BMI and height from separate genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses. We obtained melanoma SNPs from the most recent melanoma GWAS meta-analysis comprising 12 874 cases and 23 203 controls. We used the inverse variance-weighted estimator to derive separate causal risk estimates across all SNP instruments for BMI and height.

resultsBased on the combined estimate derived from 730 SNPs for BMI, we found no evidence of an association between genetically predicted BMI and melanoma [odds ratio (OR) per one standard deviation (1 SD) (4.6 kg/m2) increase in BMI 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-1.11]. In contrast, we observed a positive association between genetically-predicted height (derived from a pooled estimate of 3290 SNPs) and melanoma risk [OR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13, per 1 SD (9.27 cm) increase in height]. Sensitivity analyses using two alternative MR methods yielded similar results.

conclusionsThese findings provide no evidence for a causal association between higher BMI and melanoma, but support the notion that height is causally associated with melanoma risk. Mechanisms through which height influences melanoma risk remain unclear, and it remains possible that the effect could be mediated through diverse pathways including growth factors and even socioeconomic status.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsBody HeightBody Mass IndexGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsBody mass indexbody sizecausalityheightmelanomaMendelian randomizationskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID32068838
PMCPMC7778056
OpenAlexW3007764524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.