Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32068535›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2020

Multitarget Stool DNA Screening in Clinical Practice: High Positive Predictive Value for Colorectal Neoplasia Regardless of Exposure to Previous Colonoscopy.

Jason D Eckmann, Derek W Ebner, Jamie Bering, Allon Kahn, Eduardo Rodriguez, Mary E Devens, Kari L Lowrie, Karen Doering, Sara Then, Kelli N Burger and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anatomical Distribution of Polyps Is Different for Men and Women With Positive Stool Tests.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  16. Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Detection of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasia by Multi-target Stool DNA.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  20. Colorectal Cancer Screening With the Multitarget Stool DNA Test.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jason D EckmannDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Derek W EbnerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jamie BeringDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Allon KahnDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Eduardo RodriguezDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Mary E DevensDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kari L LowrieDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Karen DoeringDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Sara ThenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kelli N BurgerDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Douglas W MahoneyDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
David O PrichardDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Michael B WallaceDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Suryakanth R GuruduDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Lila J FinneyDivision of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Paul LimburgDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Barry BergerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
David A AhlquistDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
John B KisielDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USWinnMed · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USJacksonville College · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Multi-site Gastrointestinal Cancer Detection by Stool DNA MethylationR37CA214679 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KISIEL, JOHN · 2018 to 2024
$2.8M
Multi-cancer Early DetectionR01CA214679 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI John Kisiel, Niloy Jewel Samadder · 2025 to 2026
$891k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214679NCI NIH HHS R37 CA214679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMultitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) testing has grown as a noninvasive screening modality for colorectal cancer (CRC), but real-world clinical data are limited in the post-FDA approval setting. The effect of previous colonoscopy on MT-sDNA performance is not known. We aimed to evaluate findings of colorectal neoplasia (CRN) at diagnostic colonoscopy in patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, stratified by patient exposure to previous colonoscopy.

methodsWe identified consecutive patients completing MT-sDNA testing over a 39-month period and reviewed the records of those with positive tests for neoplastic findings at diagnostic colonoscopy. MT-sDNA test positivity rate, adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy, and the positive predictive value (PPV) of MT-sDNA for any CRN and neoplastic subtypes were calculated.

resultsOf 16,469 MT-sDNA tests completed, testing returned positive in 2,326 (14.1%) patients. After exclusion of patients at increased risk for CRC, 1,801 patients remained, 1,558 (87%) of whom underwent diagnostic colonoscopy; 918 of 1,558 (59%) of these patients had undergone previous colonoscopy, whereas 640 (41%) had not. Any CRN was found in 1,046 of 1,558 patients (PPV = 67%). More neoplastic lesions were found in patients without previous colonoscopy (73%); however, the rates remained high among those who had undergone previous colonoscopy (63%, P < 0.0001). The large majority (79%) of patients had right-sided neoplasia. DISCUSSION: MT-sDNA has a high PPV for any CRN regardless of exposure to previous colonoscopy. Right-sided CRN was found at colonoscopy in most patients with positive MT-sDNA testing, representing a potential advantage over other currently available screening modalities for CRC.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmEarly Detection of CancerFecesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrecancerous ConditionsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID32068535
PMCPMC7127971
OpenAlexW3008362548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.