Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32068533›Full record

ArticleSICOT-J2020

Does a fluoro-assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty pose an excessive risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon?

Yuta Jinnai, Tomonori Baba, Xu Zhuang, Hiroki Tanabe, Sammy Banno, Taiji Watari, Yasuhiro Homma, Kazuo Kaneko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SICOT-J, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided anterior total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuta JinnaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan.
Tomonori BabaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan.
Xu ZhuangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki TanabeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan.
Sammy BannoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan.
Taiji WatariDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhiro HommaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuo KanekoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 113-0033 Tokyo, Japan.
Juntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntraoperative fluoroscopy can be easily used because patients are placed in the supine position during total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach (DAA-THA) to reduce complications. However, the cumulative level of radiation exposure by intraoperative fluoroscopy increases as the annual number of cases increases, increasing the risk of influencing the health of both the patients and medical workers. The objective of the study was to compare the radiation exposure time of DAA-THA with osteosynthesis and to determine if the level of radiation exposure exceeded safety limits. MATERIAL AND

methodsDAA-THA was performed in 313 patients between January 2016 and July 2018 and 60 patients with proximal femoral fracture were treated with osteosynthesis. The intraoperative fluoroscopy time was retrospectively surveyed and compared between these two groups. A total of eight surgeons operated DAA-THA employing the same procedure using a traction table. A total of nine surgeons operated osteosynthesis and fluoroscopy was appropriately used during reduction and implant insertion.

resultsThe mean operative time of DAA-THA was 103.3 min and that of osteosynthesis was 83.3 min, showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). The mean intraoperative fluoroscopy time was 0.83 min (SD ± 0.68) in DAA-THA and 8.91 min (SD ± 8.34) in osteosynthesis showing a significant difference (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe intraoperative exposure level was significantly lower and the fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in DAA-THA than in osteosynthesis for proximal femoral fracture. It was clarified that the annual cumulative radiation exposure level in DAA-THA does not exceed the tissue dose limit.

Indexed as

direct anterior approachfluoroscopyradiation exposureTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32068533
PMCPMC7027395
OpenAlexW3008474521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.