ArticleJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2020
Personalized models of psychopathology as contextualized dynamic processes: An example from individuals with borderline personality disorder.
Article in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maladaptive Personality Traits in Primary Care: Validation of the German Modified Brief Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID5BF + M).Assessment · 2026Article
- From person-specific networks to personalized psychiatry: What evidence is still needed?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Major Problems in Clinical Psychological Science and How to Address them. Introducing a Multimodal Dynamical Network Approach.Cognitive therapy and research · 2024Article
- Heterogeneity in suicide risk: Evidence from personalized dynamic models.Behaviour research and therapy · 2024Article
- Dynamic processes in behavioral activation therapy for anhedonic adolescents: Modeling common and patient-specific relations.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2024Article
- A complex systems perspective on chronic aggression and self-injury: case study of a woman with mild intellectual disability and borderline personality disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- A Longitudinal Network of Borderline-Related Trait Vulnerabilities from Childhood to Adolescence.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2024Article
- Attachment Manifestations in Daily Interpersonal Interactions.Affective science · 2022Article
- Integrating a functional view on suicide risk into idiographic statistical models.Behaviour research and therapy · 2022Article
- Individualized learning potential in stressful times: How to leverage intensive longitudinal data to inform online learning.Computers in human behavior · 2021Article
- Specifying exogeneity and bilinear effects in data-driven model searches.Behavior research methods · 2021Article
- Symptoms as rapidly fluctuating over time: Revealing the close psychological interconnections among borderline personality disorder symptoms via within-person structures.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2021Article
- Assessing the Mental Health of Emerging Adults Through a Mental Health App: Protocol for a Prospective Pilot Study.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- Transdiagnostic approaches to mental health problems: Current status and future directions.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePsychopathology research has relied on discrete diagnoses, which neglects the unique manifestations of each individual's pathology. Borderline personality disorder combines interpersonal, affective, and behavioral regulation impairments making it particularly ill-suited to a "one size fits all" diagnosis. Clinical assessment and case formulation involve understanding and developing a personalized model for each patient's contextualized dynamic processes, and research would benefit from a similar focus on the individual.
methodWe use
resultsWe found that individuals vary widely in their dynamic processes in affective and interpersonal domains both within and across diagnoses. However, there was some evidence that dynamic patterns relate to transdiagnostic baseline measures. We conclude with descriptions of 2 person-specific models as an example of the heterogeneity of dynamic processes.
conclusionsThe idiographic models presented here join a growing literature showing that the individuals differ dramatically in the total patterning of these processes, even as key processes are shared across individuals. We argue that these processes are best estimated in the context of person-specific models, and that so doing may advance our understanding of the contextualized dynamic processes that could identify maintenance mechanisms and treatment targets. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.