Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32068184›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm2020

Subcutaneous nerve stimulation reduces sympathetic nerve activity in ambulatory dogs with myocardial infarction.

Yuan Yuan, Ye Zhao, Johnson Wong, Wei-Chung Tsai, Zhaolei Jiang, Ryan A Kabir, Seongwook Han, Changyu Shen, Michael C Fishbein, Lan S Chen and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Yuan YuanThe Krannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ye ZhaoThe Krannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Cardiac Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Johnson WongThe Krannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Wei-Chung TsaiThe Krannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Zhaolei JiangThe Krannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ryan A KabirThe Krannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Seongwook HanDongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Changyu ShenSmith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael C FishbeinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Lan S ChenDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Zhenhui ChenThe Krannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Thomas H EverettThe Krannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Peng-Sheng ChenThe Krannert Institute of Cardiology and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: chenpp@iu.edu.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USChina Medical University · CNIndiana University School of MedicineKeimyung University · KRUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USXinHua Hospital · CN

Funding

SK Current, beta-3 adrenoceptor activation and Sex Differences in Ventricular ArrhythmogenesisR01HL139829 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI PENG-SHENG CHEN, ZHILIN QU · 2018 to 2026
$4.5M
High Resolution, Noninvasive Measurement and Functional Classification of Vagal Nerve Response Patterns in Relation to Gastroparesis Symptom Management using Gastric Electrical Stimulation TherapyOT2OD028183 · OD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI CLEMENTS, ISAAC PERRY, EVERETT, THOMAS H · 2019 to 2021
$2.0M
Skin Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Cardiac ArrhythmiasR42DA043391 · NIDA · ARRHYTHMOTECH, LLC · PI EVERETT, THOMAS H · 2016 to 2017
$1.5M
Subcutaneous nerve stimulation for arrhythmia control.U18TR002208 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHEN, PENG-SHENG · 2017 to 2018
$1.4M
Neuromodulation for Atrial Fibrillation ControlR56HL071140 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHEN, PENG-SHENG · 2016 to 2016
$461k
NCATS NIH HHS U18 TR002208NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139829NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL071140NIDA NIH HHS R42 DA043391NIH HHS OT2 OD028183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubcutaneous nerve stimulation (ScNS) remodels the stellate ganglion and reduces stellate ganglion nerve activity (SGNA) in dogs. Acute myocardial infarction (MI) increases SGNA through nerve sprouting.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that ScNS remodels the stellate ganglion and reduces SGNA in ambulatory dogs with acute MI.

methodsIn the experimental group, a radio transmitter was implanted during the first sterile surgery to record nerve activity and an electrocardiogram, followed by a second sterile surgery to create MI. Dogs then underwent ScNS for 2 months. The average SGNA (aSGNA) was compared with that in a historical control group (n = 9), with acute MI monitored for 2 months without ScNS.

resultsIn the experimental group, the baseline aSGNA and heart rate were 4.08±0.35 μV and 98±12 beats/min, respectively. They increased within 1 week after MI to 6.91±1.91 μV (P=.007) and 107±10 beats/min (P=.028), respectively. ScNS reduced aSGNA to 3.46±0.44 μV (P<.039) and 2.14±0.50 μV (P<.001) at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after MI. In comparison, aSGNA at 4 and 8 weeks in dogs with MI but no ScNS was 8.26±6.31 μV (P=.005) and 10.82±7.86 μV (P=0002), respectively. Immunostaining showed confluent areas of remodeling in bilateral stellate ganglia and a high percentage of tyrosine hydroxylase-negative ganglion cells. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling was positive in 26.61%±11.54% of ganglion cells in the left stellate ganglion and 15.94%±3.62% of ganglion cells in the right stellate ganglion.

conclusionScNS remodels the stellate ganglion, reduces SGNA, and suppresses cardiac nerve sprouting after acute MI.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDogsElectrocardiographyHeart RateMonitoring, PhysiologicMyocardial InfarctionSympathetic Nervous SystemTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationArrhythmiasCardiac nerve sproutingElectrical stimulationImmunostainingStellate ganglion nerve activitySudden cardiac deathSympathetic nerve activity

Identifiers

PMID32068184
PMCPMC7335315
OpenAlexW3005870848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.