Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32068164›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Distinguishing cognitive effort and working memory load using scale-invariance and alpha suppression in EEG.

Omid Kardan, Kirsten C S Adam, Irida Mance, Nathan W Churchill, Edward K Vogel, Marc G Berman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dysfunctional Alpha Modulation as a Mechanism of Working Memory Impairment in Serious Mental Illness.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Temporal Dynamics of Brain Activity Predicting Sense of Agency over Muscle Movements.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effortfulness of visual working memory: Gauged by physical exertion.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omid KardanDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: okardan@uchicago.edu.
Kirsten C S AdamDepartment of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
Irida ManceDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Nathan W ChurchillNeuroscience Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Edward K VogelDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Institute for Mind and Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology, and Human Behavior, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marc G BermanDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology, and Human Behavior, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: bermanm@uchicago.edu.

Funding

The Distinction Between Number and Resolution in Visual Working MemoryR01MH087214 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI AWH, EDWARD, VOGEL, EDWARD K · 2009 to 2023
$11.0M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCET32MH020002 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SEJNOWSKI, TERRENCE J · 1999 to 2020
$6.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087214NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being intuitive, cognitive effort has proven difficult to define quantitatively. Here, we proposed to study cognitive effort by investigating the degree to which the brain deviates from its default state, where brain activity is scale-invariant. Specifically, we measured such deviations by examining changes in scale-invariance of brain activity as a function of task difficulty and posited suppression of scale-invariance as a proxy for exertion of cognitive effort. While there is some fMRI evidence supporting this proposition, EEG investigations on the matter are scant, despite the EEG signal being more suitable for analysis of scale invariance (i.e., having a much broader frequency range). In the current study we validated the correspondence between scale-invariance (H) of cortical activity recorded by EEG and task load during two working memory (WM) experiments with varying set sizes. Then, we used this neural signature to disentangle cognitive effort from the number of items stored in WM within participants. Our results showed monotonic decreases in H with increased set size, even after set size exceeded WM capacity. This behavior of H contrasted with behavioral performance and an oscillatory indicator of WM load (i.e., alpha-band desynchronization), both of which showed a plateau at difficulty levels surpassing WM capacity. This is the first reported evidence for the suppression of scale-invariance in EEG due to task difficulty, and our work suggests that H suppression may be used to quantify changes in cognitive effort even when working memory load is at maximum capacity.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyFunctional NeuroimagingAdolescentAdultAlpha RhythmCortical SynchronizationFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionYoung AdultCognitive effortEEGScale-invarianceWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID32068164
PMCPMC7134389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.