Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32067581›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020

In Vitro and In Vivo Preclinical Testing of Pericyte-Engineered Grafts for the Correction of Congenital Heart Defects.

Valeria Vincenza Alvino, Michael Kilcooley, Anita C Thomas, Michele Carrabba, Marco Fagnano, William Cathery, Elisa Avolio, Dominga Iacobazzi, Mohamed Ghorbel, Massimo Caputo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Biological Scaffolds for Congenital Heart Disease.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valeria Vincenza AlvinoBristol Heart Institute Translational Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom.
Michael KilcooleyBristol Heart Institute Translational Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom.
Anita C ThomasBristol Heart Institute Translational Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom.
Michele CarrabbaBristol Heart Institute Translational Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom.
Marco FagnanoBristol Heart Institute Translational Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom.
William CatheryBristol Heart Institute Translational Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom.
Elisa AvolioBristol Heart Institute Translational Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom.
Dominga IacobazziBristol Heart Institute Translational Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom.
Mohamed GhorbelBristol Heart Institute Translational Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom.
Massimo CaputoBristol Heart Institute Translational Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom.
Paolo MadedduBristol Heart Institute Translational Health Sciences University of Bristol Bristol Royal Infirmary Bristol United Kingdom.
Bristol Royal Infirmary · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/17/1/32804British Heart Foundation PG/15/33/31394Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/N027086/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background We have previously reported the possibility of using pericytes from leftovers of palliative surgery of congenital heart disease to engineer clinically certified prosthetic grafts. Methods and Results Here, we assessed the feasibility of using prosthetic conduits engineered with neonatal swine pericytes to reconstruct the pulmonary artery of 9-week-old piglets. Human and swine cardiac pericytes were similar regarding anatomical localization in the heart and antigenic profile following isolation and culture expansion. Like human pericytes, the swine surrogates form clones after single-cell sorting, secrete angiogenic factors, and extracellular matrix proteins and support endothelial cell migration and network formation in vitro. Swine pericytes seeded or unseeded (control) CorMatrix conduits were cultured under static conditions for 5 days, then they were shaped into conduits and incubated in a flow bioreactor for 1 or 2 weeks. Immunohistological studies showed the viability and integration of pericytes in the outer layer of the conduit. Mechanical tests documented a reduction in stiffness and an increase in strain at maximum load in seeded conduits in comparison with unseeded conduits. Control and pericyte-engineered conduits were then used to replace the left pulmonary artery of piglets. After 4 months, anatomical and functional integration of the grafts was confirmed using Doppler echography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and histology. Conclusions These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using neonatal cardiac pericytes for reconstruction of small-size branch pulmonary arteries in a large animal model.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisPericytesTissue EngineeringAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCell Culture TechniquesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalPulmonary ArterySwineTissue Scaffoldscongenital heart diseasegraftspericytestissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32067581
PMCPMC7070228
OpenAlexW3005626169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.