Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32067256›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2020

Effect of ciclosporin on safety, lymphocyte kinetics and left ventricular remodelling in acute myocardial infarction.

Suzanne Cormack, Ashfaq Mohammed, Pedram Panahi, Rajiv Das, Alison J Steel, Thomas Chadwick, Andrew Bryant, Mohaned Egred, Konstantinos Stellos, Ioakim Spyridopoulos and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02390674 (Evaluating the Effectiveness of Intravenous Ciclosporin on Reducing Reperfusion Injury in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02390674 phase2completednot on this map

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Intravenous Ciclosporin on Reducing Reperfusion Injury in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Intervention: a Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNewcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS TrustRan2015 to 2017Enrolled54ConditionsMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryArmsCiclosporin, Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Fractalkine Receptor CXFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne CormackFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ashfaq MohammedFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Pedram PanahiFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Rajiv DasFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Alison J SteelNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, UK.
Thomas ChadwickPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, UK.
Andrew BryantPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, UK.
Mohaned EgredFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Konstantinos StellosFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ioakim SpyridopoulosFreeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2750-2444
CAPRI investigators
Freeman Hospital · GBNewcastle University · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/12/31/29533British Heart Foundation FS/15/77/31823British Heart Foundation PG/18/25/33587NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsFollowing a favourable pilot trial using a single bolus of ciclosporin, it has been unclear why 2 large studies (CYCLE and CIRCUS) failed to prevent reperfusion injury and reduce infarct size in STEMI (ST elevation myocardial infarction). The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of ciclosporin on myocardial injury, left ventricular remodelling and lymphocyte kinetics in patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

methodsIn this double-blind, single centre trial, we randomly assigned 52 acute STEMI patients with an onset of pain of <6 hours and blocked culprit artery to a single bolus of ciclosporin (n = 26) or placebo (n = 26, control group) prior to reperfusion by stent percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary endpoint was infarct size at 12 weeks.

resultsMean infarct size at 12 weeks was identical in both groups (9.1% [standard deviation= 7.0] vs 9.1% [standard deviation = 7.0], P = .99; 95% confidence interval for difference: -4.0 to 4.1). CD3 T-lymphocytes dropped to similar levels at 90 minutes (867 vs 852 cells/μL, control vs ciclosporin) and increased to 1454 vs 1650 cells/μL at 24 hours.

conclusionIn our pilot trial, a single ciclosporin bolus did not affect infarct size or left ventricular remodelling, matching the results from CYCLE and CIRCUS. Our study suggests that ciclosporin does either not reach ischaemic cardiomyocytes, or requires earlier application during first medical contact. Finally, 1 bolus of ciclosporin is not sufficient to inhibit CD4 T-lymphocyte proliferation during remodelling. We therefore believe that further studies are warranted. (Evaluating the effectiveness of intravenous Ciclosporin on reducing reperfusion injury in pAtients undergoing PRImary percutaneous coronary intervention [CAPRI]; NCT02390674).

Indexed as

CyclosporineMyocardial InfarctionDouble-Blind MethodHumansKineticsLymphocytesMagnetic Resonance ImagingTreatment OutcomeVentricular RemodelingCyclosporineacute myocardial infarctioncardiac MRIciclosporinleft ventricular functionreperfusion injuryT-lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID32067256
PMCPMC7318996
OpenAlexW3007766882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.