Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32067226›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2020

Older Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Medication Value and Deprescribing: A Qualitative Study.

Aimee N Pickering, Megan E Hamm, Alicia Dawdani, Joseph T Hanlon, Carolyn T Thorpe, Walid F Gellad, Thomas R Radomski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aimee N PickeringDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-6277-6224
Megan E HammDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Alicia DawdaniDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Joseph T HanlonDivision of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Carolyn T ThorpeCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Virginia Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Walid F GelladDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Thomas R RadomskiDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-7279-188X
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Caterina Rosano · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
The Development, Validation, and Application of a Claims-based Metric of Low Value Prescribing in Older AdultsK23AG061217 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RADOMSKI, THOMAS · 2019 to 2023
$942k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG061217NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesShared decision making is essential to deprescribing unnecessary or harmful medications in older adults, yet patients' and caregivers' perspectives on medication value and how this affects their willingness to discontinue a medication are poorly understood. We sought to identify the most significant factors that impact the perceived value of a medication from the perspective of patients and caregivers.

designQualitative study using focus groups conducted in September and October 2018.

settingParticipants from the Pepper Geriatric Research Registry (patients) and the Pitt+Me Registry (caregivers) maintained by the University of Pittsburgh.

participantsSix focus groups of community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older, or their caregivers, prescribed five or more medications in the preceding 12 months. MEASUREMENTS: We sought to identify (1) general views on medication value and what makes medication worth taking; (2) how specific features such as cost or side effects impact perceived value; and (3) reactions to clinical scenarios related to deprescribing.

resultsWe identified four themes. Perceived effectiveness was the primary factor that caused participants to consider a medication to be of high value. Participants considered a medication to be of low value if it adversely affected quality of life. Participants also cited cost when determining value, especially if it resulted in material sacrifices. Participants valued medications prescribed by providers with whom they had good relationships rather than valuing level of training. When presented with clinical scenarios, participants ably weighed these factors when determining the value of a medication and indicated whether they would adhere to a deprescribing recommendation.

conclusionWe identified that perceived effectiveness, adverse effects on quality of life, cost, and a strong relationship with the prescriber influenced patients' and caregivers' views on medication value. These findings will enable prescribers to engage older patients in shared decision making when deprescribing unnecessary medications and will allow health systems to incorporate patient-centered assessment of value into systems-based deprescribing interventions. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:746-753, 2020.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsPolypharmacyAgedCaregiversFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndependent LivingMalePatientsQualitative ResearchQuality of Lifedeprescribingmedication valuepolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID32067226
PMCPMC7252489
OpenAlexW3008630646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.