Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32067094›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2020

[Neurologists and neuroscientists during the "Third Reich": attempt at an assessment].

Axel Karenberg, Heiner Fangerau, Michael Martin

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Brief History of NBIA Gene Discovery.Journal of movement disorders · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Axel KarenbergMedizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Joseph-Stelzmann-Straße 20, 50931, Köln, Deutschland. ajg02@uni-koeln.de.
Heiner FangerauInstitut für Geschichte, Theorie und Ethik der Medizin, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Moorenstraße 5, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Michael MartinMedizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Universität zu Köln, Joseph-Stelzmann-Straße 20, 50931, Köln, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On behalf of the German Neurological Society (DGN) former presidents, honorary presidents and honorary members were checked for possible formal or ideological affiliations with National Socialism (NS) 75 years after the NS dictatorship. When the DGN was reformed in 1950, 6 of the 7 "founding fathers" were former members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), which is in strong contrast with the traditional narrative of a "new beginning". The first four (Pette, Schaltenbrand, Vogel and Döring) and in total 10 out of 13 incumbent presidents until 1976 (Zülch, Bay, Hirschmann, Jung, Bauer, Behrend) as well as honorary president Bodechtel had belonged to the NSDAP, Storm Troopers (SA), or "Schutzsstaffel" (SS). Approximately two thirds of the German and Austrian honorary members appointed until 1985 had been associated with the NS system or the NS ideology (e.g. Becker, Birkmayer, Jacob, Reichardt, Seitelberger, Tönnis and von Weizsäcker). The individual attitude of neuroscientists towards eugenics ranged from approval to refusal and a few had been involved with (Appellate) Hereditary Health Courts. None of the physicians considered here were directly involved in killing patients but several of them knew of the "concomitant research" in the context of "euthanasia". Others used research resources generated during the "euthanasia"-programme and after 1945. The only professor of neurology who conducted ethically inacceptable human experiments was Georg Schaltenbrand. Almost all neurologists could pursue their career after the war, sometimes after having undergone lengthy denazification trials but very few of them were willing to face up to their past. Categorizations, such as "collaborators", "beneficiaries" and "physicians with ambivalent roles" should be replaced by a more differentiated assessment. When dealing with the past of German neurology it would be advisable to resort to a categorization of remembrance instead of naming awards after incriminated persons.

Indexed as

NeurologistsNeurologyAustriaEugenicsGermanyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansNational SocialismEugenics/historyEuthanasia/historyHuman experimentsMedical ethicsMedicine in National Socialism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.