ReviewDer Nervenarzt2020
[Neuroscientists at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Brain Research in the "Third Reich": Oskar Vogt-Hugo Spatz-Wilhelm Tönnis].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pioneers of modern brain research-Cécile and Oskar Vogt and the Nobel Prize.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2025Review
- ["… no reservations against the dismissals": the expulsion of neuroscientists from Berlin].Der Nervenarzt · 2022Review
- [A staunch National Socialist? Paul Vogel (1900-1979)].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
- [The two CVs of Klaus Joachim Zülch (1910-1988)].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
- [Otfrid Foerster (1873-1941) and his ambivalent attitude towards National Socialism].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
- [Men without a past? (Honorary) Presidents of the German Neurological Society and their NS past].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
- [In the "twilight zone": honorary members of the German Neurological Society 1954-1982].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
- [Neurologists and neuroscientists during the "Third Reich": attempt at an assessment].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
- [Heinrich Pette (1887-1964) and the difficult assessment of his role from the Weimar Republic to the Federal Republic of Germany].Der Nervenarzt · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute (KWI) for Brain Research in Berlin-Buch was one of the key institutions enmeshed in the euthanasia program between 1939 and 1945, generating scientific knowledge by dissecting the brains of murdered patients. As a consequence, this institution and its early years have attracted the attention of historians for years. The neuroanatomist Oskar Vogt (1870-1959), director of the KWI until 1937 and his wife Cécile (1875-1962) who were both appointed honorary members of the German Neurological Society (DGN) in 1952, concentrated on the microstructure and brain architecture of healthy and "elite" brains. Vogt's successor, Hugo Spatz (1888-1969), shifted research activities towards pathology of the central nervous system (CNS) and incorporated psychiatric and military institutions into the institute's network. Spatz had been a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) since 1938. As acting director of the KWI he was responsible for the dissections performed by Hallervorden on murdered patients. After the war Spatz tried to justify his actions. Years after the unveiling of these relationships the DGN decided in 1998 to rename the Hugo Spatz award. Wilhelm Tönnis (1898-1978), the German pioneer of neurosurgery had been a member of the National Socialist Air Corps since 1933 and a member of the NSDAP since 1937, finally joining the NS Medical Association in 1938. After the war he played down his affiliation to NS divisions. When his denazification trial had ended he pursued his career in the young Federal Republic of Germany. In 1976 he was elected honorary member of the DGN, 2 years before his death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32067090What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.