Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32067078›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2020

Using ultrasound to teach living anatomy to non-medical graduate students.

Theresa R Bullen, Kirsten Brown, Kathleen Ogle, Yiju Teresa Liu, Rosalyn A Jurjus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Theresa R BullenDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 461B Ross Hall, 2300 I Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Kirsten BrownDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 461B Ross Hall, 2300 I Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Kathleen OgleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Yiju Teresa LiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rosalyn A JurjusDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 461B Ross Hall, 2300 I Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA. rj58@aub.edu.lb.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3912-8020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUltrasound technology is used to supplement gross anatomy instruction in many medical sciences programs. However, this technology is not common practice for anatomy instruction in nonmedical graduate-level courses. Ultrasound sessions provide a clear view of local anatomy and could help graduate students transfer anatomical content from a didactic context onto a living, moving body. This approach to instruction complements the rapidly evolving technological advances in science education and may assist with spatial understanding, knowledge retention, and student engagement. The main objective of this article was to describe the methods used to incorporate ultrasound sessions into a graduate level gross anatomy course.

methodsThe goal of the curricula was to use ultrasound technology to create a supplemental hands-on and engaging method of learning anatomy that would appeal to graduate students and possibly reinforce content. Graduate students participated in three interactive, 2-h-long ultrasound sessions that corresponded to their gross anatomy lecture material.

resultsQuestionnaire results showed that students overwhelmingly believed that the ultrasound sessions were beneficial and that ultrasound technology should be used for anatomical instruction in graduate programs. While students found the sessions to be helpful, they sought more and longer sessions with smaller group sizes.

conclusionOverall, this article describes the methods used to incorporate multimodal learning into a graduate level anatomy course and found that students supported the methods as a potentially effective and engaging way to supplement traditional gross anatomy lectures and practical laboratory sessions.

Indexed as

AnatomyCross-Sectional StudiesEducational MeasurementEducation, GraduateHumansLearningProspective StudiesStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonographyUniversitiesAnatomyLearningTeachingUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.