Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32066870›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020

Disparities in BRCA counseling across providers in a diverse population of young breast cancer survivors.

Sonya Reid, Deborah Cragun, Ann Tezak, Anne Weidner, Jaleesa Moore, Ingrid A Mayer, Xiao-Ou Shu, Fei Ye, Run Fan, Susan Vadaparampil and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health equity in the implementation of genomics and precision medicine: A public health imperative.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The role of genomics in global cancer prevention.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sonya ReidVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Deborah CragunCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Ann TezakVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Anne WeidnerVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jaleesa MooreVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ingrid A MayerVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Xiao-Ou ShuVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Fei YeVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Run FanVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Susan VadaparampilMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Tuya PalVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. tuya.pal@vumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8009-2475

Funding

Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
Vanderbilt Training Program in Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology of CancerT32CA160056 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Xiao-Ou Shu · 2017 to 2026
$3.8M
Breast Cancer In Blacks: Impact of Genomics, Healthcare Use and Lifestyle on Outcomes (BRIGHT)R01CA204819 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI PAL, TUYA · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204819NCI NIH HHS T32 CA160056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAll women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) ≤age 50 should be referred for genetic counseling (GC) and testing. We sought to compare differences in provider practices and access across a racially and ethnically diverse population of young BC survivors.

methodsA registry-based sample of women diagnosed with invasive BC ≤age 50 from 2009 to 2012 was recruited through the Florida Cancer Registry, and completed a questionnaire and medical record release. Differences were compared across those tested with or without the involvement of a board-certified or credentialed genetics health professional (GHP) in (1) clinical and demographic variables and (2) pretest GC elements.

resultsOf 1622 participants, there were 440 Blacks, 285 Hispanics, and 897 Non-Hispanic Whites. Of 831 participants with medical record verification of testing provider, 170 (20%) had documentation of GHP involvement. Among the 613 who recalled a pretest discussion and had GC elements collected, those with GHP involvement were significantly more likely to recall the seven recognized GC elements.

conclusionGHP involvement was associated with adherence to nationally recommended best practices. With the expanding importance of identifying inherited cancers, it is critical to ensure equitable access to best practices across all populations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsCounselingFemaleFloridaGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedSurvivorsgenetic counselinggenetics health professionalgenetic testinghereditary breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID32066870
PMCPMC7275890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.