Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32066820›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Influence of the human papillomavirus on the radio-responsiveness of cancer stem cells in head and neck cancers.

Paul Reid, Alexander H Staudacher, Loredana G Marcu, Ian Olver, Leyla Moghaddasi, Michael P Brown, Eva Bezak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cannot Target What Cannot Be Seen: Molecular Imaging of Cancer Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. HPVTranslational oncology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul ReidSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. paul.reid@mymail.unisa.edu.au.
Alexander H StaudacherTranslational Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Loredana G MarcuSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Ian OlverCancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Leyla MoghaddasiDepartment of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Michael P BrownTranslational Oncology Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Eva BezakSchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing proportion of head and neck cancers (HNC) result from HPV infection. Between HNC aetiological groups (HPV positive and HPV negative) clinical evidence demonstrates significantly better treatment response among HPV positive cancers. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are identified in HNC tumour populations as agents of treatment resistance and a target for tumour control. This study examines dynamic responses in populations of a CSC phenotype in HNC cell lines following X-irradiation at therapeutic levels, and comparing between HPV statuses. Variations in CSC density between HPV groups showed no correlation with better clinical outcomes seen in the HPV positive status. CSC populations in HPV positive cell lines ranged from 1.9 to 4.8%, and 2.6 to 9.9% for HPV negative. Following 4 Gy X- irradiation however, HPV negative cell lines demonstrated more frequent and significantly greater escalation in CSC proportions, being 3-fold that of the HPV positive group at 72 hours post irradiation. CSC proportions of tumour populations are not fixed but subject to change in response to radiation at therapeutic dose levels. These findings imply a potential effect of aetiology on radio-responsiveness in CSCs, illustrating that clonogen treatment response may be more informative of therapy outcomes than inherent population density alone.

Indexed as

AgedAldehyde DehydrogenaseBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell CountCell Line, TumorFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Stem CellsPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsRadiation ToleranceAldehyde DehydrogenaseBiomarkers, TumorCD44 protein, humanHyaluronan Receptors

Identifiers

PMID32066820
PMCPMC7026429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.