Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32066732›Full record

ReviewBlood cancer journal2020

Dissecting racial disparities in multiple myeloma.

Catherine R Marinac, Irene M Ghobrial, Brenda M Birmann, Jenny Soiffer, Timothy R Rebbeck

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood cancer journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. FDA Approval Summary: Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine R MarinacDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Irene M GhobrialDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-3092
Brenda M BirmannChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Jenny SoifferUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Timothy R RebbeckDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. timothy_rebbeck@dfci.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Obesity, Molecular Biomarkers, and Multiple Myeloma PrognosisF32CA220859 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI MARINAC, CATHERINE · 2018 to 2019
$94k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA220859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a fatal plasma cell dyscrasia with a median overall survival of 5 to 10 years. MM progresses from the more common but often subclinical precursor states of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) to overt MM. There are large racial disparities in all stages of the disease. Compared with Whites, Blacks have an increased MGUS and MM risk and higher mortality rate, and have not experienced the same survival gains over time. The roots of this disparity are likely multifactorial in nature. Comparisons of Black and White MGUS and MM patients suggest that differences in risk factors, biology, and clinical characteristics exist by race or ancestry, which may explain some of the observed disparity in MM. However, poor accrual of Black MGUS and MM patients in clinical and epidemiological studies has limited our understanding of this disparity and hindered its elimination. Disparities in MM survival also exist but appear to stem from inferior treatment utilization and access rather than underlying pathogenesis. Innovative and multidisciplinary approaches are urgently needed to enhance our understanding of disparities that exist at each stage of the MM disease continuum and facilitate their elimination.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMultiple Myeloma

Identifiers

PMID32066732
PMCPMC7026439
OpenAlexW3006303865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.