Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32066646›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020

Safety and efficacy of restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors after clinically significant immune-related adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Sarah Abou Alaiwi, Wanling Xie, Amin H Nassar, Shaan Dudani, Dylan Martini, Ziad Bakouny, John A Steinharter, Pier Vitale Nuzzo, Ronan Flippot, Nieves Martinez-Chanza and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Safety and efficacy of restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients following immune-related adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Current Status in Rechallenge of Immunotherapy.International journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sarah Abou AlaiwiMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Wanling XieMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Amin H NassarMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8084-9105
Shaan DudaniDepartment of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Dylan MartiniDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ziad BakounyMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
John A SteinharterMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Pier Vitale NuzzoMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5618-8079
Ronan FlippotMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nieves Martinez-ChanzaMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Xiao WeiMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Bradley A McGregorMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Marina D KaymakcalanMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Daniel Y C HengDepartment of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mehmet A BilenDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Toni K ChoueiriMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9201-3217
Lauren C HarshmanMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA laurenC_harshman@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-1588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) induce a range of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with various degrees of severity. While clinical experience with ICI retreatment following clinically significant irAEs is growing, the safety and efficacy are not yet well characterized.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective study identified patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with ICI who had >1 week therapy interruption for irAEs. Patients were classified into retreatment and discontinuation cohorts based on whether or not they resumed an ICI. Toxicity and clinical outcomes were assessed descriptively.

resultsOf 499 patients treated with ICIs, 80 developed irAEs warranting treatment interruption; 36 (45%) of whom were restarted on an ICI and 44 (55%) who permanently discontinued. Median time to initial irAE was similar between the retreatment and discontinuation cohorts (2.8 vs 2.7 months, p=0.59). The type and grade of irAEs were balanced across the cohorts; however, fewer retreatment patients required corticosteroids (55.6% vs 84.1%, p=0.007) and hospitalizations (33.3% vs 65.9%, p=0.007) for irAE management compared with discontinuation patients. Median treatment holiday before reinitiation was 0.9 months (0.2-31.6). After retreatment, 50% (n=18/36) experienced subsequent irAEs (12 new, 6 recurrent) with 7 (19%) grade 3 events and 13 drug interruptions. Median time to irAE recurrence after retreatment was 2.8 months (range: 0.3-13.8). Retreatment resulted in 6 (23.1%) additional responses in 26 patients whose disease had not previously responded. From first ICI initiation, median time to next therapy was 14.2 months (95% CI 8.2 to 18.9) and 9.0 months (5.3 to 25.8), and 2-year overall survival was 76% (95%CI 55% to 88%) and 66% (48% to 79%) in the retreatment and discontinuation groups, respectively.

conclusionsDespite a considerable rate of irAE recurrence with retreatment after a prior clinically significant irAE, most irAEs were low grade and controllable. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm that retreatment enhances survival outcomes that justify the safety risks.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenCarcinoma, Renal CellCohort StudiesCTLA-4 AntigenFemaleHumansImmunotherapyKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanCTLA-4 AntigenCTLA4 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 Receptoradverse eventsefficacyimmune-checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapyPD-1 inhibitorssafety

Identifiers

PMID32066646
PMCPMC7057439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.