Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32066539›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2020

Predicting acute ovarian failure in female survivors of childhood cancer: a cohort study in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) and the St Jude Lifetime Cohort (SJLIFE).

Rebecca A Clark, Sogol Mostoufi-Moab, Yutaka Yasui, Ngoc Khanh Vu, Charles A Sklar, Tarek Motan, Russell J Brooke, Todd M Gibson, Kevin C Oeffinger, Rebecca M Howell and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Kidney Failure in Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Rebecca A ClarkSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Sogol Mostoufi-MoabUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yutaka YasuiSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Ngoc Khanh VuSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Charles A SklarMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Tarek MotanFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Russell J BrookeSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Todd M GibsonSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Kevin C OeffingerDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Rebecca M HowellThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Susan A SmithThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Zhe LuSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Leslie L RobisonSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Wassim ChemaitillySt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Melissa M HudsonSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Gregory T ArmstrongSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Paul C NathanThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Yan YuanSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. Electronic address: yyuan@ualberta.ca.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Mach-LETSGO: Machine-LEarning of Treatment, Survey, and Genetics towards Obtaining Correct Classification of Chronic Conditions in Adult Survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study - CCSS SupplU24CA055727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Gregory Armstrong · 1999 to 2026
$96.7M
The St. Jude Lifetime CohortU01CA195547 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI HUDSON, MELISSA M, NESS, KIRSTEN KIMBERLIE · 2015 to 2024
$14.9M
Late Effects Prediction using Clinical Phenotypes and Whole Genome SequencingR01CA216354 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI YASUI, YUTAKA, ZHANG, JINGHUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216354NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195547NCI NIH HHS U24 CA055727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer treatment can cause gonadal impairment. Acute ovarian failure is defined as the permanent loss of ovarian function within 5 years of cancer diagnosis. We aimed to develop and validate risk prediction tools to provide accurate clinical guidance for paediatric patients with cancer.

methodsIn this cohort study, prediction models of acute ovarian failure risk were developed using eligible female US and Canadian participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) cohort and validated in the St Jude Lifetime Cohort (SJLIFE) Study. 5-year survivors from the CCSS cohort were included if they were at least 18 years old at their most recent follow-up and had complete treatment exposure and adequate menstrual history (including age at menarche, current menstrual status, age at last menstruation, and menopausal aetiology) information available. Participants in the SJLIFE cohort were at least 10-year survivors. Participants were excluded from the prediction analysis if they had an ovarian hormone deficiency, had missing exposure information, or had indeterminate ovarian status. The outcome of acute ovarian failure was defined as permanent loss of ovarian function within 5 years of cancer diagnosis or no menarche after cancer treatment by the age of 18 years. Logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machines were used as candidate methods to develop the risk prediction models in the CCSS cohort. Prediction performance was evaluated internally (in the CCSS cohort) and externally (in the SJLIFE cohort) using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the precision-recall curve (average precision [AP; average positive predictive value]).

findingsData from the CCSS cohort were collected for participants followed up between Nov 3, 1992, and Nov 25, 2016, and from the SJLIFE cohort for participants followed up between Oct 17, 2007, and April 16, 2012. Of 11 336 female CCSS participants, 5886 (51·9%) met all inclusion criteria for analysis. 1644 participants were identified from the SJLIFE cohort, of whom 875 (53·2%) were eligible for analysis. 353 (6·0%) of analysed CCSS participants and 50 (5·7%) of analysed SJLIFE participants had acute ovarian failure. The overall median follow-up for the CCSS cohort was 23·9 years (IQR 20·4-27·9), and for SJLIFE it was 23·9 years (19·0-30·0). The three candidate methods (logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machines) yielded similar results, and a prescribed dose model with abdominal and pelvic radiation doses and an ovarian dose model with ovarian radiation dosimetry using logistic regression were selected. Common predictors in both models were history of haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, cumulative alkylating drug dose, and an interaction between age at cancer diagnosis and haematopoietic stem-cell transplant. External validation of the model in the SJLIFE cohort produced an estimated AUC of 0·94 (95% CI 0·90-0·98) and AP of 0·68 (95% CI 0·53-0·81) for the ovarian dose model, and AUC of 0·96 (0·94-0·97) and AP of 0·46 (0·34-0·61) for the prescribed dose model. Based on these models, an online risk calculator has been developed for clinical use.

interpretationBoth acute ovarian failure risk prediction models performed well. The ovarian dose model is preferred if ovarian radiation dosimetry is available. The models, along with the online risk calculator, could help clinical discussions regarding the need for fertility preservation interventions in girls and young women newly diagnosed with cancer.

fundingCanadian Institutes of Health Research, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, National Cancer Institute, and American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCanadaCancer SurvivorsChildCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesNeoplasmsPrimary Ovarian InsufficiencyPrognosisRisk AssessmentYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32066539
PMCPMC7060129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.