Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32066527›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2020

Effect of a conditional cash transfer programme on leprosy treatment adherence and cure in patients from the nationwide 100 Million Brazilian Cohort: a quasi-experimental study.

Julia M Pescarini, Elizabeth Williamson, Joilda S Nery, Anna Ramond, Maria Yury Ichihara, Rosemeire L Fiaccone, Maria Lucia F Penna, Liam Smeeth, Laura C Rodrigues, Gerson O Penna and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cohort Profile: The 100 Million Brazilian Cohort.International journal of epidemiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia M PescariniCentre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Salvador, Brazil. Electronic address: julia.pescarini@fiocruz.br.
Elizabeth WilliamsonDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Health Data Research, London, UK.
Joilda S NeryInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Anna RamondDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Maria Yury IchiharaCentre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Salvador, Brazil.
Rosemeire L FiacconeCentre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Salvador, Brazil; Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Maria Lucia F PennaUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Instituto de Saúde da Comunidade, Niterói, Brazil.
Liam SmeethDepartment of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Health Data Research, London, UK.
Laura C RodriguesDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Gerson O PennaNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília, Escola FIOCRUZ de Governo Fundação Oswaldo Crus Brasília, Brazil.
Elizabeth B BrickleyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mauricio L BarretoCentre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Salvador, Brazil; Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRInstituto de Saúde · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRHealth Data Research UK · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/N017250/1Wellcome Trust 202912/B/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndirect financial costs and barriers to health-care access might contribute to leprosy treatment non-adherence. We estimated the association of the Brazilian conditional cash transfer programme, the Programa Bolsa Família (PBF), on leprosy treatment adherence and cure in patients in Brazil.

methodsIn this quasi-experimental study, we linked baseline demographic and socioeconomic information for individuals who entered the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort between Jan 1, 2007, and Dec 31, 2014, with the PBF payroll database and the Information System for Notifiable Diseases, which includes nationwide leprosy registries. Individuals were eligible for inclusion if they had a household member older than 15 years and had not received PBF aid or been diagnosed with leprosy before entering the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort; they were excluded if they were partial receivers of PBF benefits, had missing data, or had a monthly per-capita income greater than BRL200 (US$50). Individuals who were PBF beneficiaries before leprosy diagnosis were matched to those who were not beneficiaries through propensity-score matching (1:1) with replacement on the basis of baseline covariates, including sex, age, race or ethnicity, education, work, income, place of residence, and household characteristics. We used logistic regression to assess the average treatment effect on the treated of receipt of PBF benefits on leprosy treatment adherence (six or more multidrug therapy doses for paucibacillary cases or 12 or more doses for multibacillary cases) and cure in individuals of all ages. We stratified our analysis according to operational disease classification (paucibacillary or multibacillary). We also did a subgroup analysis of paediatric leprosy restricted to children aged up to 15 years.

findingsWe included 11 456 new leprosy cases, of whom 8750 (76·3%) had received PBF before diagnosis and 2706 (23·6%) had not. Overall, 9508 (83·0%) patients adhered to treatment and 10 077 (88·0%) were cured. After propensity score matching, receiving PBF before diagnosis was associated with adherence to treatment (OR 1·22, 95% CI 1·01-1·48) and cure (1·26, 1·01-1·58). PBF receipt did not significantly improve treatment adherence (1·37, 0·98-1·91) or cure (1·12, 0·75-1·67) in patients with paucibacillary leprosy. For patients with multibacillary disease, PBF beneficiaries had better treatment adherence (1·37, 1·08-1·74) and cure (1·43, 1·09-1·90) than non-beneficiaries. In the propensity score-matched analysis in 2654 children younger than 15 years with leprosy, PBF exposure was not associated with leprosy treatment adherence (1·55, 0·89-2·68) or cure (1·57, 0·83-2·97).

interpretationOur results suggest that being a beneficiary of the PBF, which facilitates cash transfers and improved access to health care, is associated with greater leprosy multidrug therapy adherence and cure in multibacillary cases. These results are especially relevant for patients with multibacillary disease, who are treated for a longer period and have lower cure rates than those with paucibacillary disease.

fundingCONFAP/ESRC/MRC/BBSRC/CNPq/FAPDF-Doenças Negligenciadas, the UK Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust, and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brazil (CAPES).

Indexed as

AdultBrazilFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansLeprostatic AgentsLeprosyMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsTreatment Adherence and ComplianceYoung AdultLeprostatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID32066527
PMCPMC7191267
OpenAlexW3006173875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.