Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32066497›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2020

Intrapulmonary concentrations of meropenem administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized pharmacokinetic trial.

Adela Benítez-Cano, Sonia Luque, Luisa Sorlí, Jesús Carazo, Isabel Ramos, Nuria Campillo, Víctor Curull, Albert Sánchez-Font, Carles Vilaplana, Juan P Horcajada and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CarbapenemsHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Adela Benítez-CanoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain. ABenitez-cano@parcdesalutmar.cat.ORCID 0000-0003-4794-5936
Sonia LuqueInfectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain. sluque@parcdesalutmar.cat.
Luisa SorlíInfectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Jesús CarazoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabel RamosDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Nuria CampilloInfectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Víctor CurullUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Albert Sánchez-FontUniversitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Carles VilaplanaLaboratory Department, Laboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan P HorcajadaInfectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Ramón AdaliaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia BermejoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Enric SamsóDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
William HopeDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool and Royal Liverpool Broadgreen University Hospital Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Santiago GrauInfectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal antimicrobial drug exposure in the lung is required for successful treatment outcomes for nosocomial pneumonia. Little is known about the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem when administered by continuous infusion (CI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the PK of two dosages of meropenem (3 g vs 6 g/day by CI) in the plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

methodsThirty-one patients (81% male, median (IQR) age 72 (22) years) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Sixteen patients received 1 g/8 h and 15 2 g/8 h by CI (8 h infusion). Plasma and ELF meropenem concentrations were modeled using a population methodology, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of attaining (PTA) a free ELF concentration of 50% of time above MIC (50% fT>MIC), which results in logarithmic killing and the suppression of resistance in experimental models of pneumonia.

resultsThe median (IQR) of meropenem AUC

conclusionsAn increase in the dose of meropenem administered by CI achieved a higher exposure in the plasma and ELF. The use of the highest licensed dose of 6 g/day may be necessary to achieve an optimal coverage in ELF for all susceptible isolates (MIC ≤ 2 mg/L) in patients with conserved renal function. An alternative therapy should be considered when the presence of microorganisms with a MIC greater than 2 mg/L is suspected.

trial registrationThe trial was registered in the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT-no. 2016-002796-10). Registered on 27 December 2016.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCross InfectionHealthcare-Associated PneumoniaMeropenemAgedFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsMeropenemCritically ill patientsDose selectionLung penetrationMeropenemNosocomial pneumoniaPharmacodynamicsPopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID32066497
PMCPMC7026992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.