Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32066490›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Smartphone-based secondary prevention intervention for university students with unhealthy alcohol use identified by screening: study protocol of a parallel group randomized controlled trial.

Nicolas Bertholet, Elodie Schmutz, Véronique S Grazioli, Mohamed Faouzi, Jennifer McNeely, Gerhard Gmel, Jean-Bernard Daeppen, John A Cunningham

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Insight into Selecting Adolescents for Drinking Intervention Programs: a Simulation Based on Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicolas BertholetAddiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. Nicolas.Bertholet@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5064-6377
Elodie SchmutzAddiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Véronique S GrazioliCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mohamed FaouziAddiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jennifer McNeelyDepartment of Population Health, Section on Tobacco, Alcohol and Drug Use, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Gerhard GmelAddiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Bernard DaeppenAddiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
John A CunninghamCenter for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 176295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnhealthy alcohol use is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among young people, including university students. Delivering secondary prevention interventions against unhealthy alcohol use is challenging. Information technology has the potential to reach large parts of the general population. The present study is proposed to test a proactive secondary prevention smartphone-based intervention against unhealthy alcohol use.

methodsThis is a parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (1:1 allocation ratio) among 1696 university students with unhealthy alcohol use, identified by screening and followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Participants will be randomized to receive access to a smartphone-based intervention or to a no intervention control condition. The primary outcome will be self-reported volume of alcohol drunk over the past 30 days, reported as the mean number of standard drinks per week over the past 30 days, measured at 6 months. Secondary outcomes will be number of heavy drinking days over the past 30 days, at 6 months. Additional outcomes will be maximum number of drinks on any day over the past 30 days, alcohol-related consequences (measured using the Short Inventory of Problems (SIP-2R), and academic performance. DISCUSSION: The aim of this trial is to close the evidence gap on the efficacy of smartphone-based secondary prevention interventions. If proven effective, smartphone-based interventions have the potential to reach a large portion of the population, completing what is available on the Internet.

trial registrationISRCTN, 10007691. Registered on 2 December 2019. Recruitment will start in April 2020.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSmartphoneAdolescentAlcohol Drinking in CollegeAlcohol-Related DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMass ScreeningMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSecondary PreventionSelf ReportStudentsSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID32066490
PMCPMC7027100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.