Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32066488›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2020

Validation of neuromuscular blocking agent use in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Wei Chang, Qin Sun, Fei Peng, Jianfeng Xie, Haibo Qiu, Yi Yang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Atracurium Versus Cisatracurium in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Myorelaxants in ARDS patients.Intensive care medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei ChangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Qin SunDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Fei PengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Jianfeng XieDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Haibo QiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Yi YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China. yiyiyang2004@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1661-3568

Funding

Jiangsu Province's Key Discipline/Laboratory of Medicine ZDXKA2016025Jiangsu Province's Key Provincial Talents Program ZDRCA2016082Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program SBE2018750279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to synthesize up-to-date trials to validate the effects of neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) use in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

methodsSeveral databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register were searched up to November 14, 2019. All randomized trials investigating the use of NMBAs in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS and reporting mortality data were included in the meta-analysis. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were clinical outcomes, including respiratory physiological parameters, incidence of barotrauma, ICU-free days, and ventilation-free days.

resultsA total of 7 trials enrolling 1598 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results revealed that the use of NMBAs in moderate-to-severe ARDS could significantly decrease the mortality truncated to day 28 (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.98, P = 0.03) and day 90 (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99, P = 0.04). NMBA use could significantly decrease the incidence of barotrauma (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.87, P = 0.009). No significant difference was observed in ICU-free days or ventilation-free days between the NMBA and control groups.

conclusionThe use of NMBAs could significantly decrease mortality in moderate-to-severe ARDS patients and decrease the incidence of barotrauma during mechanical ventilation. However, more large-scale randomized trials are needed to further validate the effect of NMBA use in ARDS.

Indexed as

Neuromuscular Blocking AgentsRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeBarotraumaDyspneaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsAcute respiratory distress syndromeARDSMortalityNeuromuscular blocking agentNMBA

Identifiers

PMID32066488
PMCPMC7027110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.