Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32066425›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Users' acceptance of electronic patient portals in Lebanon.

Gladys N Honein-AbouHaidar, Jumana Antoun, Karim Badr, Sani Hlais, Houry Nazaretian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gladys N Honein-AbouHaidarHariri School of Nursing, American University of Beirut, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon. gh30@aub.edu.lb.ORCID 0000-0001-6208-7859
Jumana AntounFaculty of Medicine, Family Medicine Department, American University of Beirut, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon.
Karim BadrHariri School of Nursing, American University of Beirut, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon.
Sani HlaisFaculty of Medicine, Family Medicine Department, American University of Beirut, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon.
Houry NazaretianAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center, American University of Beirut, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcceptance of Electronic patient portal (EPP) is instrumental for its success. Studies on users' acceptance in the Middle East region are scarce. This study aims to use the TAM as a framework to quantitatively describe potential users, diabetic and chronic high blood pressure patients and their providers, intention to use and factors influencing the intention to use EPP at AUBMC-FMC We concurrently test the internal construct validity and the reliability of the TAM.

methodsA cross-sectional survey design and the vignette approach were used. For validation, we needed a minimum of 180 patients; all 35 attending physicians and 11 registered nurses were targeted. We used descriptive statistics to calculate the intention to use EPP and its determinants based on the TAM constructs. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) were employed to estimate significant path coefficients for patients only as the sample size of providers was too small.

resultsWe had 199 patients, half intended to use EPP; 73% of providers (N = 17) intended to use EPP. Perceived ease of use and privacy concerns were significantly higher among providers than patients (Mean (M) = 0.77 vs M = 0.42 (CI: - 0.623; - 0.081)) and (M = 3.67 vs M = 2.13, CI: - 2.16; - 0.91) respectively; other constructs were not significantly different. Reliability of TAM revealed a Cronbach Alpha of α=.91. EFA showed that three components explained 73.48% of the variance: Behavioral Intention of Use (14.9%), Perceived Ease of Use (50.74%), Perceived Usefulness (7.84%). SEM found that perceived ease of use increased perceived usefulness (standardized regression weight = 0.49); perceived usefulness (0.51) had more predictive value than perceived ease of use (0.27) to explain the behavioral intention of use of the EPP.

conclusionsWe found that providers valued the usefulness of EPP and were mostly intending to use it. This finding has yet to be tested in future studies testing actual use as intention and actual use may not be concordant. The intention to use among patients was lower than those reported in developed countries. We identified two factors that we need to address to increase use, namely perceived ease and usefulness, and proposed practical implications to address them; future research directions were also discussed.

Indexed as

Attitude to ComputersPatient PortalsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLatent Class AnalysisLebanonMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceReproducibility of ResultsArabElectronic health recordMiddle EastPatient portalTAM modelUser acceptance

Identifiers

PMID32066425
PMCPMC7027116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.