SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2020
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on duration of mechanical ventilation in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of midazolam versus dexmedetomidine in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- The Effect of Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative Agent for Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Dexmedetomidine's Role in Adult ICU After 20 Years of Experience-A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring the association between dexmedetomidine and all-cause mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis through propensity score matching analysis and machine learning algorithms: a MIMIC-IV retrospective study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Impact of a Dexmedetomidine Intravenous Infusion in Septic Dogs: Preliminary Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Dexmedetomidine improves clinical outcomes in sepsis-induced myocardial injury: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Article
- Use of dexmedetomidine in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.Annals of intensive care · 2022Review
- Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Meta-analysis comparing dexmedetomidine versus standard of care for sedation in patients with sepsis.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2022Review
- Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit.Current anesthesiology reports · 2021Review
- Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Patients With Sepsis Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBecause of its analgesic and light sedative properties, the highly selective alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been suggested for the treatment of septic patients, but its effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation remains unclear. The present study was conducted to review the extant literature in DEX and determine its influence on ventilation time in adult septic patients.
methodsDatabases of PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE were applied till 20th January 2019 without language restriction. The searching strategy as following: sepsis OR septic AND mechanical ventilation AND dexmedetomidine. Two authors screened titles, abstracts, and even articles to meet the including criterion independently. In addition, references of related articles or reviews were also referred. Data was recorded in a table and analyzed using the software of Review Manager 5.0.
resultsFour studies with a total of 349 patients were included. Three trials with 267 patients revealed the effect of DEX on duration of mechanical ventilation, two trials with 264 patients on ventilator-free days and four trials with 334 patients on 28-day mortality. The analyzed results indicated that DEX was not associated with significantly different durations of mechanical ventilation (MD 0.65, 95% CI, - 0.13 to 1.42, P = 0.10). However, there were significant differences in ventilator-free days (MD 3.57, 95% CI, 0.26 to 6.89, P = 0.03) and 28-day mortality (RR 0.61, 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.94, P = 0.02) in the septic patients.
conclusionAdministration of DEX for sedation in septic patients was not associated with the duration of mechanical ventilation, but it increased the ventilator-free days and reduced 28-day mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.