Trial reportBMC public health2020
Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04230343 (Limits of the Social Benefit Motive Among High-risk Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Limits of the Social Benefit Motive Among High-risk Patients: a Field Experiment on Influenza
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Pooled it
- Information nudges for influenza vaccination: Evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial in Finland.PLoS medicine · 2022Trial
- Behavioural determinants of testing behaviour during a hypothetical human-to-human avian influenza outbreak: an interview study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Framing vaccination as a collective responsibility increases intentions to vaccinate.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2026Article
- How to activate threat perceptions in behavior research: A simple technique for inducing health and resource scarcity threats.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Social competition drives collective action to reduce informal waste burning in Uganda.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- The Effect of Nudging on Compliance with Individual Prevention Measures against COVID-19: An Online Experiment on Greek University Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Warming up cool cooperators.Nature human behaviour · 2023Article
- COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Beliefs and Behaviors Among Patients With and Survivors of Hematologic Malignancies.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Communicating the move to individualized donor selection policy: Framing messages focused on recipients and safety.Transfusion · 2023Article
- Collective Value Promotes the Willingness to Share Provaccination Messages on Social Media in China: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- An Online Experiment of NHS Information Framing on Mothers' Vaccination Intention of Children against COVID-19.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Internal and External Motivations and Risk Perception toward COVID-19 Vaccination in Adolescents in the U.S.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Article
- Awareness, knowledge and attitude toward influenza vaccination in several population groups in China: A cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Social nudges for vaccination: How communicating herd behaviour influences vaccination intentions.British journal of health psychology · 2021Article
- Don't get it or don't spread it: comparing self-interested versus prosocial motivations for COVID-19 prevention behaviors.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Influenza vaccine uptake among at-risk adults (aged 16-64 years) in the UK: a retrospective database analysis.BMC public health · 2021Article
- A future-forward influenza immunization model of care for high-risk patients in pharmacies: A Canadian consensus.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfluenza vaccine uptake remains low worldwide, inflicting substantial costs to public health. Messages promoting social welfare have been shown to increase vaccination intentions, and it has been recommended that health professionals communicate the socially beneficial aspects of vaccination. We provide the first test whether this prosocial vaccination hypothesis applies to actual vaccination behaviour of high-risk patients.
methodsIn a field experiment at a tertiary care public hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, we compare the effects of two motivational messages for promoting vaccination. Using a between-subjects single-blind experimental design patients were randomly assigned to frames emphasizing the vaccine's benefits to self (n = 125) or social benefits (n = 119). Free influenza vaccination was offered to each patient.
resultsAmong 222 patients who were not vaccinated for the season prior to the study (72% medically assessed to be at high risk), 42% in the self-benefit frame chose to receive a vaccination compared with 34% in the social-benefits frame, but the difference was not statistically significant (aOR = 1.63, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.95, p = 0.108). Reasons for vaccination focused primarily on self-benefit (67%) rather than social-benefit (5%). Exploratory analysis showed that the effect of messages depended on patient perception of risk group membership (aOR
conclusionsIn contrast to the literature observing intentions of low-risk populations, we found no evidence that social-benefit motivates actual vaccination behaviour among a high-risk patient population. Instead, those who self-categorize as being in the high risk group are more motivated by the self-benefit message. Our results suggest that a stratified approach can improve coverage: even if an emphasis on social-benefit could be effective among low-risk groups, an emphasis on self-benefit holds more promise for increasing vaccination in medical organizational settings where high-risk groups are prevalent.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04230343 Retrospectively registered on the 13th January 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.