ArticleBMC genomics2020
Comparison of the performance of an amplicon sequencing assay based on Oxford Nanopore technology to real-time PCR assays for detecting bacterial biodefense pathogens.
Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of Nanopore amplicon sequencing method for culture-free genotyping ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Portable solutions for plant pathogen diagnostics: development, usage, and future potential.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Detection of fungal sequences in human brain: rDNA locus amplification and deep sequencing.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Culture and amplification-free nanopore sequencing for rapid detection of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes from urine.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024Article
- Review
- Development of a Targeted NGS Assay for the Detection of Respiratory Pathogens including SARS-CoV-2 in Felines.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A prospective study of nanopore-targeted sequencing in the diagnosis of central nervous system infections.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Review
- Amplicon Sequencing Minimal Information (ASqMI): Quality and Reporting Guidelines for Actionable Calls in Biodefense Applications.Journal of AOAC International · 2023Article
- Review
- Defective COX1 expression in aging mice liver.Biology open · 2023Article
- Discovery and genome characterization of six new orthoparamyxoviruses in small Belgian mammals.Virus evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Nanopore Sequencing Using the Full-Length 16S rRNA Gene for Detection of Blood-Borne Bacteria in Dogs Reveals a Novel Species of Hemotropic Mycoplasma.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Phasing of de novo mutations using a scaled-up multiple amplicon long-read sequencing approach.Human mutation · 2022Article
- Article
- Clinical Performance of Nanopore Targeted Sequencing for Diagnosing Infectious Diseases.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Performance of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for the Identification ofInfection and drug resistance · 2022Article
- Nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing for the rapid and precise detection of pathogens among immunocompromised cancer patients with suspected infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe state-of-the-art in nucleic acid based biodetection continues to be polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and many real-time PCR assays targeting biodefense pathogens for biosurveillance are in widespread use. These assays are predominantly singleplex; i.e. one assay tests for the presence of one target, found in a single organism, one sample at a time. Due to the intrinsic limitations of such tests, there exists a critical need for high-throughput multiplex assays to reduce the time and cost incurred when screening multiple targets, in multiple pathogens, and in multiple samples. Such assays allow users to make an actionable call while maximizing the utility of the small volumes of test samples. Unfortunately, current multiplex real-time PCR assays are limited in the number of targets that can be probed simultaneously due to the availability of fluorescence channels in real-time PCR instruments.
resultsTo address this gap, we developed a pipeline in which the amplicons produced by a 14-plex end-point PCR assay using spiked samples were subsequently sequenced using Nanopore technology. We used bar codes to sequence multiple samples simultaneously, leading to the generation and subsequent analysis of sequence data resulting from a short sequencing run time (< 10 min). We compared the limits of detection (LoD) of real-time PCR assays to Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT)-based amplicon sequencing and estimated the sample-to-answer time needed for this approach. Overall, LoDs determined from the first 10 min of sequencing data were at least one to two orders of magnitude lower than real-time PCR. Given enough time, the amplicon sequencing approach is approximately 100 times more sensitive than real-time PCR, with detection of amplicon specific reads even at the lowest tested spiking concentration (around 2.5-50 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/ml).
conclusionsBased on these results, we propose amplicon sequencing assay as a viable alternative to replace the current real-time PCR based singleplex assays for higher throughput biodefense applications. We note, however, that targeted amplicon specific reads were not detectable even at the highest tested spike concentrations (2.5 X 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.