Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32066372›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Comparison of the performance of an amplicon sequencing assay based on Oxford Nanopore technology to real-time PCR assays for detecting bacterial biodefense pathogens.

Robert Player, Kathleen Verratti, Andrea Staab, Christopher Bradburne, Sarah Grady, Bruce Goodwin, Shanmuga Sozhamannan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Culture and amplification-free nanopore sequencing for rapid detection of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes from urine.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Case reports in infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert PlayerThe Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Kathleen VerrattiThe Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Andrea StaabNaval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, VA, USA.
Christopher BradburneThe Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Sarah GradyThe Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Bruce GoodwinDefense Biological Product Assurance Office, JPEO-CBRND Enabling Biotechnologies (JPEO-CBRND-EB), 110 Thomas Johnson Drive, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Shanmuga SozhamannanDefense Biological Product Assurance Office, JPEO-CBRND Enabling Biotechnologies (JPEO-CBRND-EB), 110 Thomas Johnson Drive, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA. Shanmuga.Sozhamannan.ctr@mail.mil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6762-7874
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory · USBiotechnology Innovation Organization · USNaval Surface Warfare Center · USUniversité de Bourgogne · FR

Funding

MINORITY INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH TRAINING (MIRT)T37TW000024 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI ORTIZ, CHARLES L · 1993 to 2004
$1.0M
Joint Program Executive Office NAVSEA Contract Number N00024-13-D-6400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe state-of-the-art in nucleic acid based biodetection continues to be polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and many real-time PCR assays targeting biodefense pathogens for biosurveillance are in widespread use. These assays are predominantly singleplex; i.e. one assay tests for the presence of one target, found in a single organism, one sample at a time. Due to the intrinsic limitations of such tests, there exists a critical need for high-throughput multiplex assays to reduce the time and cost incurred when screening multiple targets, in multiple pathogens, and in multiple samples. Such assays allow users to make an actionable call while maximizing the utility of the small volumes of test samples. Unfortunately, current multiplex real-time PCR assays are limited in the number of targets that can be probed simultaneously due to the availability of fluorescence channels in real-time PCR instruments.

resultsTo address this gap, we developed a pipeline in which the amplicons produced by a 14-plex end-point PCR assay using spiked samples were subsequently sequenced using Nanopore technology. We used bar codes to sequence multiple samples simultaneously, leading to the generation and subsequent analysis of sequence data resulting from a short sequencing run time (< 10 min). We compared the limits of detection (LoD) of real-time PCR assays to Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT)-based amplicon sequencing and estimated the sample-to-answer time needed for this approach. Overall, LoDs determined from the first 10 min of sequencing data were at least one to two orders of magnitude lower than real-time PCR. Given enough time, the amplicon sequencing approach is approximately 100 times more sensitive than real-time PCR, with detection of amplicon specific reads even at the lowest tested spiking concentration (around 2.5-50 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/ml).

conclusionsBased on these results, we propose amplicon sequencing assay as a viable alternative to replace the current real-time PCR based singleplex assays for higher throughput biodefense applications. We note, however, that targeted amplicon specific reads were not detectable even at the highest tested spike concentrations (2.5 X 10

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionNanoporesNanotechnologyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBacteriaHumansReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityBiodefenseBiodetectionBiosurveillanceHigh throughput PCR assayLoDMultiplexOxford Nanopore sequencingReal-time PCRSingleplex

Identifiers

PMID32066372
PMCPMC7026984
OpenAlexW3010792071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.