ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020
A customizable deep learning model for nosocomial risk prediction from critical care notes with indirect supervision.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of predictive models for hospital-acquired pressure injury using machine learning.Nursing open · 2023Pooled it
- Early prediction of pressure injury risk in hospitalized patients using supervised machine learning models based on nursing records.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting acute kidney injury in trauma using an extreme gradient boosting model.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Mapping Artificial Intelligence Research Trends in Critical Care Nursing: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Early Prediction of Cardiac Arrest in the Intensive Care Unit Using Explainable Machine Learning: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Implementable Prediction of Pressure Injuries in Hospitalized Adults: Model Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Neural Granger Causal Discovery for Derangements in ICU-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury Patients.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- An AdaBoost-based algorithm to detect hospital-acquired pressure injury in the presence of conflicting annotations.Computers in biology and medicine · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive and Improved Definition for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury Classification Based on Electronic Health Records: Comparative Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Article
- Machine learning models for predicting acute kidney injury: a systematic review and critical appraisal.Clinical kidney journal · 2022Article
- Current status and trends in researches based on public intensive care databases: A scientometric investigation.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Examining the Concordance in the Documented Pressure Injury Site, Stage, and Count in Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveReliable longitudinal risk prediction for hospitalized patients is needed to provide quality care. Our goal is to develop a generalizable model capable of leveraging clinical notes to predict healthcare-associated diseases 24-96 hours in advance.
methodsWe developed a reCurrent Additive Network for Temporal RIsk Prediction (CANTRIP) to predict the risk of hospital acquired (occurring ≥ 48 hours after admission) acute kidney injury, pressure injury, or anemia ≥ 24 hours before it is implicated by the patient's chart, labs, or notes. We rely on the MIMIC III critical care database and extract distinct positive and negative cohorts for each disease. We retrospectively determine the date-of-event using structured and unstructured criteria and use it as a form of indirect supervision to train and evaluate CANTRIP to predict disease risk using clinical notes.
resultsOur experiments indicate that CANTRIP, operating on text alone, obtains 74%-87% area under the curve and 77%-85% Specificity. Baseline shallow models showed lower performance on all metrics, while bidirectional long short-term memory obtained the highest Sensitivity at the cost of significantly lower Specificity and Precision. DISCUSSION: Proper model architecture allows clinical text to be successfully harnessed to predict nosocomial disease, outperforming shallow models and obtaining similar performance to disease-specific models reported in the literature.
conclusionClinical text on its own can provide a competitive alternative to traditional structured features (eg, lab values, vital signs). CANTRIP is able to generalize across nosocomial diseases without disease-specific feature extraction and is available at https://github.com/h4ste/cantrip.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.