Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32065620›Full record

Trial reportCardiovascular research2021

Vascular effects of serelaxin in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

David Corcoran, Aleksandra Radjenovic, Ify R Mordi, Sheraz A Nazir, Simon J Wilson, Markus Hinder, Denise P Yates, Surendra Machineni, Jose Alcantara, Margaret F Prescott and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cardiovascular research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Cardiovascular effects of relaxin-2: therapeutic potential and future perspectives.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

David CorcoranBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Aleksandra RadjenovicBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Ify R MordiBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Sheraz A NazirDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.
Simon J WilsonBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Markus HinderNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Denise P YatesNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Surendra MachineniNovartis Healthcare Private Limited, Hyderabad, India.
Jose AlcantaraNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Margaret F PrescottNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Barbara GugliottaNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Yinuo PangNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Niko TzemosLondon Health Science Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Scott I SempleBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David E NewbyBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Gerry P McCannDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.
Iain SquireDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK.
Colin BerryBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
British Heart Foundation · GBGolden Jubilee National Hospital · GBNovartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United States) · USUniversity of Leicester · GBNovartis (India) · INWestern University · CA

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/14/15/30661British Heart Foundation RE/18/6134217Medical Research Council G0701127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe effects of serelaxin, a recombinant form of human relaxin-2 peptide, on vascular function in the coronary microvascular and systemic macrovascular circulation remain largely unknown. This mechanistic, clinical study assessed the effects of serelaxin on myocardial perfusion, aortic stiffness, and safety in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND

resultsIn this multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, 58 patients were randomized 1:1 to 48 h intravenous infusion of serelaxin (30 µg/kg/day) or matching placebo. The primary endpoints were change from baseline to 47 h post-initiation of the infusion in global myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) assessed using adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and applanation tonometry-derived augmentation index (AIx). Secondary endpoints were: change from baseline in AIx and pulse wave velocity, assessed at 47 h, Day 30, and Day 180; aortic distensibility at 47 h; pharmacokinetics and safety. Exploratory endpoints were the effect on cardiorenal biomarkers [N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), endothelin-1, and cystatin C]. Of 58 patients, 51 were included in the primary analysis (serelaxin, n = 25; placebo, n = 26). After 2 and 6 h of serelaxin infusion, mean placebo-corrected blood pressure reductions of -9.6 mmHg (P = 0.01) and -13.5 mmHg (P = 0.0003) for systolic blood pressure and -5.2 mmHg (P = 0.02) and -8.4 mmHg (P = 0.001) for diastolic blood pressure occurred. There were no between-group differences from baseline to 47 h in global MPR (-0.24 vs. -0.13, P = 0.44) or AIx (3.49% vs. 0.04%, P = 0.21) with serelaxin compared with placebo. Endothelin-1 and cystatin C levels decreased from baseline in the serelaxin group, and there were no clinically relevant changes observed with serelaxin for NT-proBNP or hsTnT. Similar numbers of serious adverse events were observed in both groups (serelaxin, n = 5; placebo, n = 7) to 180-day follow-up.

conclusionIn patients with stable CAD, 48 h intravenous serelaxin reduced blood pressure but did not alter myocardial perfusion.

Indexed as

AgedArterial PressureBiomarkersCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleManometryMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingProspective StudiesPulse Wave AnalysisRecombinant ProteinsBiomarkersRecombinant ProteinsRelaxinserelaxin protein, humanVasodilator AgentsAortic stiffnessCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial perfusionSerelaxin

Identifiers

PMID32065620
PMCPMC7797213
OpenAlexW3004328961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.