Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32065578›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2020

nanoMLST: accurate multilocus sequence typing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION with a dual-barcode approach to multiplex large numbers of samples.

Ci-Hong Liou, Han-Chieh Wu, Yu-Chieh Liao, Tsai-Ling Yang Lauderdale, I-Wen Huang, Feng-Jui Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular Detection and Identification of Plant-AssociatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Subtyping Evaluation ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ci-Hong LiouNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan, ROC.
Han-Chieh WuNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan, ROC.
Yu-Chieh LiaoInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan, ROC.
Tsai-Ling Yang LauderdaleNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan, ROC.
I-Wen HuangNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan, ROC.
Feng-Jui ChenNational Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan, ROC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is one of the most commonly used methods for studying microbial lineage worldwide. However, the traditional MLST process using Sanger sequencing is time-consuming and expensive. We have designed a workflow that simultaneously sequenced seven full-length housekeeping genes of 96 meticillin-resistant

Indexed as

HumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMultilocus Sequence TypingNanopore SequencingStaphylococcal InfectionsWorkflowdual-barcode multiplexingmeticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)MinIONmolecular typingmultilocus sequence typing (MLST)nanopore

Identifiers

PMID32065578
PMCPMC7200061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.