Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32065306›Full record

SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2020

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of fistula laser closure.

H Elfeki, M Shalaby, S H Emile, A Sakr, M Mikael, L Lundby

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evidence outside the box: Minimally invasive treatment for anal fistula.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Toward less invasive coloproctology: The future is out there.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  15. Surgical Management of Perianal Crohn's Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H ElfekiDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt. hossamelfeki@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0704-4068
M ShalabyDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt.
S H EmileDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt.
A SakrDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt.
M MikaelDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
L LundbyDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKMansoura University Hospital · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFistula laser closure (FiLaC) is a novel sphincter-saving technique for the treatment of fistula-in-ano. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the FiLaC procedure.

methodsDatabases including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for articles assessing FiLaC. All studies including case series and comparative studies reporting the outcome of FiLaC in the treatment of fistula-in-ano were considered eligible. The main outcomes were healing rates of fistula laser closure, postoperative complications including incontinence, technical aspects of the procedure and failure of healing.

resultsSeven studies were included. There were a total of 454 patients, 69.1% with a transsphincteric fistula-in-ano and 35% with recurrent disease. The median age of the patients was 43 years (range 18-83 years). The median operation time was 18.3 min (range 6-32 min). With a median follow-up of 23.7 months, the weighed mean rate of primary healing was 67.3% and the overall success when FiLaC was reused was 69.7%. The weighted mean rate of complications was 4%, all of them were minor complications and the weighted mean rate of continence affection was 1% in the form of minor soiling.

conclusionsFiLaC may be considered an effective and safe sphincter-saving technique for the treatment of fistula-in-ano with an acceptable, low, complication rate. However, well-designed randomized control trials comparing FiLaC with other techniques are required to substantiate the promising outcomes reported in this review.

Indexed as

Rectal FistulaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnal CanalHumansLasersMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeWound HealingYoung AdultAnal fistulaFiLaCFistula-in-anoLaserOutcomePerianal fistula

Identifiers

PMID32065306
OpenAlexW3006231543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.