Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32065287›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2020

Diagnostic performance of imaging for the detection of peritoneal metastases: a meta-analysis.

I van 't Sant, M P Engbersen, P A Bhairosing, D M J Lambregts, R G H Beets-Tan, W J van Driel, A G J Aalbers, N F M Kok, M J Lahaye

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. MRI for restaging pancreatic cancer.Insights into imaging · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [BMJ open · 2026
    Observational
  11. Diagnostic value of [Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Value of anQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I van 't SantDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. i.jansen@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5438-7827
M P EngbersenDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P A BhairosingScientific Information Service, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D M J LambregtsDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R G H Beets-TanDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W J van DrielDepartment of Gynaecology, CGOA location The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A G J AalbersDepartment of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
N F M KokDepartment of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M J LahayeDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006, BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDetection of peritoneal metastases (PM) is key in the staging and management of gastrointestinal and ovarian cancer patients. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the diagnostic performance of CT, PET(CT), and (DW)MRI in detecting PM.

methodsA literature search in Pubmed, Embase (Ovid), and Scopus was performed (January 1997-May 2018) to identify studies reporting on the accuracy of imaging PM in the diagnostic workup of gastrointestinal or ovarian cancers. Inclusion criteria were region-based or patient-based studies comprising > 15 patients, surgery/histology/radiological follow-up as a reference standard, and sufficient data to construct a 2 × 2 contingency table. Two observers performed data extraction. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model and hierarchical summary operating curves (HSROC) were generated.

resultsOf 3457 citations retrieved, twenty-four articles met all inclusion criteria. Thirty-seven datasets could be extracted for analysis including 20 for CT, 10 for PET(CT), and 7 for (DW)MRI. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR for the detection of PM for region-based studies for CT were 68% (CI, 46-84%), 88%(CI, 81-93%), and 15.9 (CI, 4.4-58.0) respectively; 80% (CI, 57-92%), 90% (CI, 80-96%), and 36.5 (CI, 6.7-199.5) for PET(CT), respectively; 92% (CI, 84-96%), 85% (CI, 78-91%), 63.3 (CI, 31.5-127.3) for (DW)MRI. In the patient-based group, not enough studies were included to make a pooled analysis for (DW)MRI and PET(CT).

conclusion(DW)MRI and PET(CT) showed comparable diagnostic performance for the detection of peritoneal metastases in ovarian and gastrointestinal cancer patients. Since MRI is more widely available than PET(CT) in clinical practice, this potentially is the imaging method of choice in most centers in the future. KEY POINTS: • Detection of peritoneal metastases plays an important role in the accurate staging of cancer patients, however, there is no accepted reference standard for the imaging of peritoneal metastases • This meta-analysis shows that (DW)MRI provided the highest sensitivity for the detection of peritoneal metastases in ovarian and gastrointestinal cancer patients • Although (DW)MRI and PET(CT) show a comparable overall diagnostic performance, (DW)MRI seems to be the imaging method of choice since it is more available in daily practice than PET(CT).

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansNeoplasm MetastasisPeritoneal NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiographyMagnetic resonance imagingPeritoneal neoplasmsPositron emission tomography computed tomographySpiral computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID32065287
OpenAlexW3005793340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.