Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32065082›Full record

ArticleCognition & emotion2020

Affect enhances object-background associations: evidence from behaviour and mathematical modelling.

Christopher R Madan, Aubrey G Knight, Elizabeth A Kensinger, Katherine R Mickley Steinmetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition & emotion, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The P300, the LPP, context updating, and memory: What is the functional significance of the emotion-related late positive potential?International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2023
    Review
  7. Aesthetic experience enhances first-person spatial representation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. The power of negative and positive episodic memories.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher R MadanDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3228-6501
Aubrey G KnightDepartment of Psychology, Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC, USA.
Elizabeth A KensingerDepartment of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1940-231X
Katherine R Mickley SteinmetzDepartment of Psychology, Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9576-9733

Funding

How Emotion Affects Memory for Detail: Behavioral and Neuroimaging InvestigationsR01MH080833 · NIMH · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI KENSINGER, ELIZABETH ANN · 2008 to 2016
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recognition memory paradigms, emotional details are often recognised better than neutral ones, but at the cost of memory for peripheral details. We previously provided evidence that, when peripheral details must be recalled using central details as cues, peripheral details from emotional scenes are at least as likely to be recalled as those from neutral scenes. Here we replicated and explicated this result by implementing a mathematical modelling approach to disambiguate the influence of target type, scene emotionality, scene valence, and their interactions. After incidentally encoding scenes that included neutral backgrounds with a positive, negative, or neutral foreground objects, participants showed equal or better cued recall of components from emotional scenes compared to neutral scenes. There was no evidence of emotion-based impairment in cued recall in either of two experiments, including one in which we replicated the emotion-induced memory trade-off in recognition. Mathematical model fits indicated that the emotionality of the encoded scene was the primary driver of improved cued-recall performance. Thus, even when emotion impairs recognition of peripheral components of scenes, it can preserve the ability to recall which scene components were studied together.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalModels, TheoreticalAdultAffectCuesEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMental RecallRecognition, Psychologyassociation-memorycued recallEmotionmemoryscenes

Identifiers

PMID32065082
PMCPMC7381356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.