Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32065041›Full record

ArticleJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2020

Perceived Risks, Benefits, and Interest in Participating in Environmental Health Studies That Share Personal Exposure Data: A U.S. Survey of Prospective Participants.

Julia O Udesky, Katherine E Boronow, Phil Brown, Laura J Perovich, Julia Green Brody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia O UdeskySilent Spring Institute, Newton, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4103-9318
Katherine E BoronowSilent Spring Institute, Newton, MA, USA.
Phil BrownNortheastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Laura J PerovichSilent Spring Institute, Newton, MA, USA.
Julia Green BrodySilent Spring Institute, Newton, MA, USA.

Funding

Data Sharing and Privacy Protection in Digital-Age Environmental Health StudiesR01ES021726 · NIEHS · SILENT SPRING INSTITUTE · PI BRODY, JULIA GREEN, BROWN, PHILIP M. · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES021726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the willingness of prospective study participants to share environmental health data. To fill this gap, we conducted a hypothetical vignette survey among 1,575 women who have volunteered to be contacted about breast cancer studies. Eighty-three percent were interested in participating in the environmental studies, with little difference whether data were restricted to the research team, shared with approved researchers, or publicly accessible. However, participants somewhat preferred controlled access for children's data. Respondents were more interested in studies with environmental rather than biological samples and more interested when researchers would return personal results, a practice of increasing importance. They were more reluctant to share location or to participate if studies involved electronic medical records. Many expressed concerns about privacy, particularly security breaches, but reidentification risks were mentioned infrequently, indicating that this topic should be discussed during informed consent.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentPrivacyChildEnvironmental HealthFemaleHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesbiomonitoringbiorepositories/biobanksdata sharingenvironmental healthprivacy

Identifiers

PMID32065041
PMCPMC7429332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.