ArticleESC heart failure2020
Outcome in German and South African peripartum cardiomyopathy cohorts associates with medical therapy and fibrosis markers.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bromocriptine in peripartum cardiomyopathy: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.ESC heart failure · 2025Pooled it
- Prolactin Inhibition in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Current problems in cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of bromocriptine in peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of prolactin and iron deficiency in peripartum cardiomyopathy.Open heart · 2020Pooled it
- PINP levels in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure are associated with myocardial fibrosis and clinical outcomes.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Impact on Left Ventricular Function and Mortality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Peripartum cardiomyopathy: a review of prevalence and treatment trends from an African perspective.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Precision medicine in peripartum cardiomyopathy: advancing diagnosis and management through genomic and phenotypic integration.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Biomarkers in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy-What We Know and What Is Still to Be Found.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- The inflammatory spectrum of cardiomyopathies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Incidence, Risk Factors, Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Peripartum Cardiomyopathy (PPCM) in Oman.Global heart · 2023Article
- Pathophysiology and risk factors of peripartum cardiomyopathy.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Review
- Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Acute Stage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Maternal Morbidity and Mortality: Are We Getting to the "Heart" of the Matter?Journal of women's health (2002) · 2021Review
- Genetics of Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Current Knowledge, Future Directions and Clinical Implications.Genes · 2021Review
- Outcome in German and South African peripartum cardiomyopathy cohorts associates with medical therapy and fibrosis markers.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study aims to compare the clinical course of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) cohorts from Germany (G-PPCM) and South Africa (SA-PPCM) with fibrosis-related markers to get insights into novel pathomechanisms of PPCM. METHODS AND
resultsG-PPCM (n = 79) and SA-PPCM (n = 72) patients and healthy pregnancy-matched women from Germany (n = 56) and South Africa (n = 40) were enrolled. Circulating levels of procollagen type-I (PINP) and type-III (PIIINP) N-terminal propeptides, soluble ST2, galectin-3, and full-length and cleaved osteopontin (OPN) were measured at diagnosis (baseline) and 6 months of follow-up. Both cohorts received standard heart failure therapy while anticoagulation therapy was applied in 100% of G-PPCM but only in 7% of SA-PPCM patients. In G-PPCM patients, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower, and outcome was better (baseline LVEF, 24 ± 8%, full recovery: 52%, mortality: 0%) compared with SA-PPCM patients (baseline LVEF: 30 ± 9%, full recovery: 32%, mortality: 11%; P < 0.05). At baseline, PINP/PIIINP ratio was lower in SA-PPCM and higher in G-PPCM compared with respective controls, whereas total OPN was elevated in both collectives. Cleaved OPN, which increases PIIINP levels, is generated by thrombin and was reduced in patients receiving anticoagulation therapy. High baseline galectin-3, soluble ST2, and OPN levels were associated with poor outcome in all PPCM patients.
conclusionsSA-PPCM patients displayed a more profibrotic biomarker profile, which was associated with a less favourable outcome despite better cardiac function at baseline, compared with G-PPCM patients. Use of bromocriptine and anticoagulation therapy in G-PPCM may counteract fibrosis and may in part be responsible for their better outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.