Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32064347›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

Nano- and microplastics affect the composition of freshwater benthic communities in the long term.

P E Redondo-Hasselerharm, G Gort, E T H M Peeters, A A Koelmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P E Redondo-HasselerharmAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management group, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8055-6847
G GortBiometris, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0626-2813
E T H M PeetersAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management group, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2541-1829
A A KoelmansAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management group, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7176-4356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the societal concern about the presence of nano- and microplastics in the environment, our nescience with respect to in situ effects is disturbing. Data on long-term implications under ecologically realistic conditions are particularly important for the risk assessment of nano- and microplastics. Here, we evaluate the long-term (up to 15 months) effects of five concentrations of nano- and microplastics on the natural recolonization of sediments by a macroinvertebrate community. Effects were assessed on the community composition, population sizes and species diversity. Nano- and microplastics adversely affected the abundance of macroinvertebrates after 15 months, which was caused by a reduction in the number of Naididae at the highest concentration (5% plastic per sediment dry weight). For some other taxa, smaller but still significant positive effects were found over time, altogether demonstrating that nano- and microplastics affected the community composition.

Indexed as

Fresh WaterModels, BiologicalAnimalsInvertebratesMicroplasticsNanoparticlesMicroplastics

Identifiers

PMID32064347
PMCPMC6994214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.