ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2020
Measurement of the useful field of view for single slices of different imaging modalities and targets.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relating the perceived useful field of view to visual search in 2D Images and 3D volumetric images.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Peripheral liver metastases are more frequently missed than central metastases in contrast-enhanced CT: insights from a 25-reader performance study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Greater benefits of deep learning-based computer-aided detection systems for finding small signals in 3D volumetric medical images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- The Use of Machine Learning in Eye Tracking Studies in Medical Imaging: A Review.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024Review
- A 2D Synthesized Image Improves the 3D Search for Foveated Visual Systems.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2023Article
- Head and body cues guide eye movements and facilitate target search in real-world videos.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Visual adaptation to medical images: a comparison of digital mammography and tomosynthesis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- The Functional Visual Field(s) in simple visual search.Vision research · 2022Article
- Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Review
- What do experts look at and what do experts find when reading mammograms?Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Comparative observer effects in 2D and 3D localization tasks.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- The Search Patterns of Abdominal Imaging Subspecialists for Abdominal Computed Tomography: Toward a Foundational Pattern for New Radiology Residents.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2021Article
- Search of low-contrast liver lesions in abdominal CT: the importance of scrolling behavior.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.