Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32064296›Full record

ArticleEarth's future2019

Usable Science for Managing the Risks of Sea-Level Rise.

Robert E Kopp, Elisabeth A Gilmore, Christopher M Little, Jorge Lorenzo-Trueba, Victoria C Ramenzoni, William V Sweet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Earth's future, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unlocking the benefits of transparent and reusable science for climate risk management.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reinforcement learning-based adaptive strategies for climate change adaptation: An application for coastal flood risk management.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Robert E KoppDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences Rutgers University Piscataway NJ USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-9428
Elisabeth A GilmoreDepartment of International Development, Community and Environment Clark University Worcester MA USA.
Christopher M LittleAtmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. Lexington MA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9228-5861
Jorge Lorenzo-TruebaDepartment of Earth and Environmental Studies Montclair State University Montclair NJ USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7082-7762
Victoria C RamenzoniDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences Rutgers University Piscataway NJ USA.
William V SweetCenter for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services NOAA National Ocean Service Silver Spring MD USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USAtmospheric and Environmental Research · USClark University · USMontclair State University · USNOAA National Ocean Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sea-level rise sits at the frontier of usable climate climate change research, because it involves natural and human systems with long lags, irreversible losses, and deep uncertainty. For example, many of the measures to adapt to sea-level rise involve infrastructure and land-use decisions, which can have multigenerational lifetimes and will further influence responses in both natural and human systems. Thus, sea-level science has increasingly grappled with the implications of (1) deep uncertainty in future climate system projections, particularly of human emissions and ice sheet dynamics; (2) the overlay of slow trends and high-frequency variability (e.g., tides and storms) that give rise to many of the most relevant impacts; (3) the effects of changing sea level on the physical exposure and vulnerability of ecological and socioeconomic systems; and (4) the challenges of engaging stakeholder communities with the scientific process in a way that genuinely increases the utility of the science for adaptation decision making. Much fundamental climate system research remains to be done, but many of the most critical issues sit at the intersection of natural sciences, social sciences, engineering, decision science, and political economy. Addressing these issues demands a better understanding of the coupled interactions of mean and extreme sea levels, coastal geomorphology, economics, and migration; decision-first approaches that identify and focus research upon those scientific uncertainties most relevant to concrete adaptation choices; and a political economy that allows usable science to become used science.

Indexed as

adaptationclimate changedecision makinggeomorphologymigrationsea level

Identifiers

PMID32064296
PMCPMC7006779
OpenAlexW2981264568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.