Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32064284›Full record

ArticleAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology2020

Size specific dose estimate (SSDE) for estimating patient dose from CT used in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT.

Vishnukumar Rajaraman, Madhusudhanan Ponnusamy, Dhanapathi Halanaik

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vishnukumar RajaramanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Madhusudhanan PonnusamyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Dhanapathi HalanaikDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSize specific dose estimate (SSDE) is a new parameter that includes patient size factor in its calculation. Recent studies have produced mixed results on the utility of SSDE, especially when automatic exposure control (AEC) was used. The objective of the study was to find out if there is a relationship between patient size and each of the parameters, SSDE and CTDIvol, when AEC is used.

methodsCT data of consecutively selected 111 patients were included for analysis. CTDIvol values of the CT scans were extracted for each patient. Effective diameter of each patient was calculated as geometric mean of anteroposterior and lateral diameters measured on axial CT images. Corresponding conversion factors for effective diameters were obtained from American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) report 204. SSDE was obtained as the product of CTDIvol and conversion factor values. Linear regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between patient size and the parameters SSDE and CTDIvol.

resultsMean weight was 62 (11.5) and range was 34 - 103 kg. Median CTDIvol (mGy) on AEC mode was 7.27(IQ range 7.27, 7.65) and mean effective diameter was 26.2 cm (2.4). Mean SSDE (mGy) was 10.6 (0.84). Good positive correlation was obtained between CTDIvol and effective diameter (r=0.536; p<0.0005). Strong inverse correlation was noted between SSDE and effective diameter (r=-0.777; p<0.0005). Linear regression model for establishing relationship between CTDIvol and effective diameter showed slope of 0.314mGy/cm (R=0.561; R2=0.314; P<0.0005) whereas between effective diameter and SSDE slope was -0.23mGy/cm (R=0.676; R2=0.457; P< 0.0005).

conclusionThe study shows that CTDIvol and SSDE vary but divergently, with patient size. SSDE is a better estimate of patient radiation dose from CT of MPI SPECT/CT than CTDIvol in systems that use automated exposure control.

Indexed as

CTDIPatient dose in CTSSDE

Identifiers

PMID32064284
PMCPMC6994783
OpenAlexW2982553281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.