Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32064278›Full record

ArticleAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology2020

Pezhman Shahrokhi, Alireza Emami-Ardekani, Sara Harsini, Mohammad Eftekhari, Armaghan Fard-Esfahani, Babak Fallahi, Najme Karamzade Ziarati, Mehdi Akhlaghi, Saeed Farzanefar, Amir Pejman Hashemi Taheri and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A head-to-head prospective comparative analysis ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Expanding the therapeutic horizon ofNagoya journal of medical science · 2025
    Review
  4. Superior lesion detection withQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Does the Incremental Value ofNuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pezhman ShahrokhiResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza Emami-ArdekaniResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sara HarsiniResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad EftekhariResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Armaghan Fard-EsfahaniResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Babak FallahiResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Najme Karamzade ZiaratiResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi AkhlaghiResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed FarzanefarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Pejman Hashemi TaheriDepartment of Radiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Davood BeikiResearch Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shariati Hospital · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives

methodsTwenty-five patients (males:females=8:17; age range=2-71 years) with clinically proven or suspicious neuroblastoma, pheochromocytoma (PCC) or paraganglioma (PGL) were enrolled in this prospective study and underwent both

resultsReferring to radiological imaging and histopathological findings as reference standard,

conclusionThis relatively small patient cohort suggests

Indexed as

131I-MIBG68Ga-DOTATATENeural crest tumorsPET/CT

Identifiers

PMID32064278
PMCPMC6994775
OpenAlexW2994678839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.